Sentences with phrase «yet seen any evidence»

After all, plant - based meat is already commercially available and we have not yet seen evidence that it has taken market shares from conventional meat.

The trade group, which represents formula giants like Nestlé and Danone on an EU - level, said it had not yet seen evidence or data demonstrating that reducing mothers» and caregivers» access to information has a positive impact on public health.

And spokespeople for two organizations that are collating dossiers for Johnson's inbox — Universities UK, which represents British higher - education institutions, and the Institute of Physics — both told Nature on July 20 that despite concerns, they haven't yet seen evidence that Brexit is having a widespread impact.

I don't yet see evidence that print publications are much interested in serials; if they are, it makes total sense they would tap a well - known storyteller like Smith — since then the cachet of his name helps with marketing and promotion of their product.

Jason Wang, vice president of risk analytics at Progressa, an alternative lender that services mostly subprime clients, hasn't yet seen evidence that higher borrowing costs are leading to more missed payments, but that could change, he says.

It's important to talk to the SSA and the IRS if you have reason to believe your Social Security number has been compromised, even if you don't yet see any evidence of financial fraud.

Mistakes can be made and should be allowed to be corrected in a timely manner once pointed out, yet I see no evidence of that in this case — please point out the corrective NSF press release and media conference if I have missed it, and I will be happy to drop this line of argument.

Not exact matches

I have yet to see any evidence that labour market imperfections can be blamed for the bulk of rising wages, particularly for professions identified by the report such as «account manager» and «financial planner.»

But we haven't heard or seen any direct evidence yet.»

After delivering prepared remarks, he said: «We don't see any strong evidence yet of a decisive move up in wages.

We have yet to see any evidence that this is remotely informative in advance.

And it is this abatement of the great distortions that have caused growth to slow so rapidly, and although we haven't seen much evidence of significant rebalancing yet, it should take a few years for the effects fully to be worked out.

But, judging from recent messaging, Fed policymakers have yet to see compelling evidence of an acceleration in overall activity, viewing growth as set to remain at around trend rates, and are reluctant to factor in any significant impact from the Trump administration's future policies.

Yet I've also remarked how most evidence I see still points to late - cycle not end - cycle.

Though we don't see that evidence yet, and continued economic and valuation risks are likely to keep us hedged with put option coverage in any event, it's possible that we could cover a portion of our short call option hedges if we do see some firming of internals.

Experimental evidence needs to be integrated into a broader philosophy of nature if one wishes to find (or to deny) the existence of a deity, but the deity so discovered would not yet be seen as the Creator.

The second thief could not see the Kingdom and had no fist - hand knowledge of the afterlife (the «evidence» that we have been discussing), yet in the midst of being crucified, He pronounced his faith in Jesus.

Jesuit «scientists» see all the same science, and yet imagine they «see» god in it despite the total lack of any evidence whatsoever for that conclusion.

Since no one has yet to SEE an atom, the idea of the structure of the atom can only be inferred by experimental evidence — yet I see no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over tiSEE an atom, the idea of the structure of the atom can only be inferred by experimental evidence — yet I see no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over tisee no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over time.

I see al lot of claims of evidence for god, but yet none is provided.

... no evidence it was, yet there it is... when you look at it, it in fact was not designed, but it was laid down over millions of years... a sedimentary rock... the rock was not designed... maybe the PROCESSES that made the rock were desined... not really... gravity makes water flow into the lowest ares and when the water moves more slowly, sediment is dropped, forming rock... Still not seeing a designer... what about water... simple chmistry there, designed?

So the biblical experts say there is not enough evidence to make a determination, yet you, who has never seen the fragment, declares that it is talking about the church.

I have yet to see any convincing evidence of prophecy in the Bible.

No, evidence is not proof; but I have yet to see either where God is concerned.

I have yet to see a single one of them produce any evidence for their claims.

Here is my version of my atheism: I have yet to see any evidence that convinces me any gods exist at all and quite a bit that convinces me the anthropomorphic all - loving, all - knowing, omnipresent god of the Abrahamic religions does not.

Yet more evidence of the counter questioning spirit is the recent proposal in the pages of this journal for a postmodern theology of identity (William H. Willimon, «Answering Pilate: Truth and the Postliberal Church» [January 28, 1987]; see also Readers» Response, «A Challenge to Willimon's Postliberalism» [April 1, 1987]-RRB-.

No one can prove God's existence, since that would defeat the purpose of life, but I've yet to see anyone offer convincing evidence that he doesn't exist.

Yet, against all reason and evidence, there are those who insist that the world is flat or that they have seen Elvis Presley or been captured by space aliens.

given that 78 % of Americans are Christians and 4 % of Americans are atheist / agnostic, and yet you see this as a cause of «turbulence» is evidence of the foundational weakness of your philosophy.

... I'm 38 she still can't tell me... She says he just is JUst faith - the evidence of things not yet seen... Well that is not a good enough answer... Then that would just make us also just who we are then now... Either way I don't worry cause whever life takes me / us it has to better than this economy... lolololol

I have yet to see anyone provide any actual evidence to the contrary.

I saw in Mohler's review of the book yet another illustration of what I have described here; for as Mohler related the book's argument, there was precious little appeal to evidence, and considerably more to morality and emotion.

However, I have yet to see a single missive from you that provides any evidence you possess a brain.

I define an atheist as someone who suspends (or defers) belief because they don't (yet) see sufficient evidence.

In reality, this will be yet more evidence that morality comes from humans, not books, but none of the Christians who undergo this shift will see it that way.

You are all just creating a fantastical make - believe narrative around yourself and they are coming to a different conclusion than you do, yet you see fit to disparage their beliefs that they have zero evidence of, by relying on your beliefs which you have zero evidence of.

Akpom's a better dribbler, but as for a strikers instinct, I haven't seen any evidence as of yet.

But your initial statement was that Schrock was «overwhelmingly better,» and I don't see enough evidence for that yet.

What really galls me is that Wenger gets paid 8 million a year to manage a side and yet even the lowest paid bin man who is an arsenal fan can see that OG and Theo are NOT nor will they EVER be up to scratch un yet Wenger persisits against all the evidence because he so desperately wants to prove the world wrong about either or both of the afore mentioned.

I have seen no evidence that either of them participated in any kind of bad behavior, or even knew about any of the specific events, yet I have a hard time believing that neither of them had a sense that something was going on.

I am not saying that it is not true but we still have to see some evidences yet.

The UNC scandal is by far the most egregious evidence we've seen yet.

Though the football is far from, well, good (Lambert's a bright coach, yet have I seen any evidence he's a miracle worker) they at least play with a degree of positivity - ie; endeavour to pass the thing - and the young chaps he's drafted in appear committed, fearless and a darn sight easier to love.

Spurs are clearly trying to save face, fully aware that there is every chance they are going to lose out on both Keane and Berbatov, who are fed up of being promised glory, yet seeing little evidence to back it up.

I have yet to see evidence that if your child is between 1 and 2 and in a proper seat for their weight that there is much difference - I grew up in an age where seat belts were optional and we used to ride in the car on each other's laps or in the front seat near the dashboard so moving my child to forward facing when it becomes necessary and they are not 2 yet I feel is not bad at all.

And yet... when I look around I do see beginnings everywhere, and evidence of spring work that has happened when the rain (and snow) breaks.

I hope you can show us that sleep - training and infant is in fact a safe and appropriate way to sidestep evolution, but I have yet to see evidence of this.

I also think it is interesting that I frequently see claimed that «Parents in other cultures bedshare and don't report sleep problems,» yet the evidence I've seen indicates that parents in Asian cultures where bedsharing is the norm DO report more sleep problems than parents following the Western model.

Protection of breast feeding from commercial exploitation should be among the highest priorities for the international community, yet violations of the World Health Organization's code of marketing of breast milk substitutes have been seen regularly, despite companies» expressed intentions to conform.1 — 3 The study by Aguayo et al in west Africa in this issue (p 127) provides further evidence that many manufacturers fly in the face of the code by providing free samples, giving donations to health workers, and contravening standards for labelling.4