And
yet traditional published authors face enormous obstacles in this regard.
Not exact matches
The
traditional industry, while maybe not
yet embracing indie
publishing, has certainly come a long way from the days in which a vanity press - produced title was the kiss of death for an
author's future
publishing career; it's now becoming more and more common for publishers to seek out
authors whose titles that have a proven following thanks to self -
publishing.
Some numbers have shown that as many as 67 % of self -
published authors fully intend to repeat the process with their future works, with most of those
authors already deciding that their as - of -
yet unwritten books will be self -
published, bypassing the
traditional industry altogether.
Yet, from
traditional publishers and practiced
authors alike, the idea of self -
publishing is frequently met with disapproval or discouragement.
The rates given here are for first books from
authors who have not
yet published with a
traditional house.
There is no doubt that
traditional publishing channels can offer expertise and distribution resources that self -
publishing channels still find difficult to penetrate, but
yet again we have another
author speaking from within the
traditional industry, albeit with experience of running an independent bookshop, trying to suggest that the woes and challenges facing the industry — at least some of them — lie squarely with
authors and readers, the two marginalised protagonists existing at opposite extremes of the
traditional industry and also divided by it.
If I had the time to write a whole lot more than I already do, then I might try some
author -
publishing, but when looking at it in a risk - benefit kinda way, those three as -
yet unwritten novels just HAVE to go via my agent, via
traditional routes of publication.
Yet social media engagement has become so vital that many
traditional publishing contracts now have clauses that require writers have
author websites and... Continue Reading
I'm an indie
author though I'm
yet to
publish an ebook just done the
traditional hardcovers.
Yet social media engagement has become so vital that many
traditional publishing contracts now have clauses that require writers have
author websites and active online profiles.
This isn't
yet another murky blog that defiantly stamps its foot over the «problems» in
traditional publishing, and the sheer audacity of
publishing companies to expect an
author to help with marketing, all of which usually acts as a thin veil that covers what is, at best, an uninspired book and at worst a flimsy manuscript littered with bad formatting, typos, grammatical errors and plot inconsistencies.
This isn't
yet another murky blog that defiantly stamps its foot over the «problems» in
traditional publishing, and the sheer audacity of
publishing companies to expect an
author to help with -LRB-...)
Anyway, as I'm also an
author (only short fiction and poetry for now) who hasn't
yet published, I would like to know if you think it still makes sense to go the
traditional route of first submitting my short stories to magazines, stack a hundred rejection letters before actually selling one story etc., or it would make more sense to just e-publish my short stories for 0.99?
• Palatium: A New Go - Between for
Authors and Subscription Services • BookExpo's Coming Changes: Smaller, and Not Only in Name •
Yet Another Self -
Publishing Platform — This Time from Books - A-Million • Europe's Court Rules That All's Fair in Print and Ebook Lending • The
Authors Guild's Look at Potential Election Implications • The Latest New Imprints in
Traditional Publishing • Links of Interest • Hot Sheet Index • Hot Sheet Services Directory • Upcoming Events Where You'll Find Us
If you're a self -
published author and you lower your price on Amazon below $ 2.99, your royalty drops to 30 % (which seems really low — and
yet it's still higher than the
traditional industry standard royalty for e-books of 25 %).
APE's thesis is powerful
yet simple: filling the roles of
author, publisher and entrepreneur yields results that rival
traditional publishing.
Yet, platform can make or break a
traditional publishing deal and it's the foundation for a successful book launch and career as an
author.
But all this gnashing of teeth and shaking of fists and using what happened to,
yet again, promote the tired agenda of «The Evil
Traditional Publishing Oppressors and their Apologists vs The Pure, Noble, Sparkly Unicorn Hearts and Souls of REAL
Authors» is really, really....
Authors such as John Locke have shown that selling a million copies of a self -
published book is not only possible but entirely feasible — and the fact that he and other writers who do so get to keep 70 percent of the proceeds is
yet another wakeup call for the
traditional industry.
Unlike some established
authors such as J.A. Konrath, who have done well with
traditional publishing deals before moving into self -
publishing their own e-books, Hocking has never had a
traditional publishing deal — and
yet, she has sold almost one million copies of the nine e-books she has written in less than a year, and her latest book appears to be selling at the rate of about 100,000 copies a month.
With many folk from
traditional publishers using paid - for reviews as
yet another stick to beat self -
published authors with, in some cases it's hard to pinpoint if publishers are more angered by the moral issues these have thrown up or by the fact that these
authors have manipulated the system to propel their books above more «worthy» traditionally
published books.
It's possible to sell far fewer copies as a self -
published author and
yet earn more than a
traditional deal would pay you; it's also possible to sell more copies as a self -
published author but not earn as much as a publisher's advance and royalties.