Sentences with phrase «yet warm atmosphere»

It gave the kitchen a clean look, and also produced a dark, yet warm atmosphere which generally promotes a relaxed and comforting ambiance.

Not exact matches

Decades of scientific investigation across multiple lines of evidence corroborate a powerful yet inconvenient truth: Human - caused global warming and climate change is real, and it's briskly accelerating as we dump more carbon into the atmosphere.

Adorned in warm shades and artwork, the atmosphere is luxurious yet inviting.

Yet despite all the complexities, a firm and ever - growing body of evidence points to a clear picture: the world is warming, this warming is due to human activity increasing levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, and if emissions continue unabated the warming will too, with increasingly serious consequences.

The only way the world is going to be able to limit warming to 2 °C is by sucking vast amounts of carbon from the atmosphere, using technology that does not yet exist.

The researchers have found yet another peculiarity of Venus» upper atmosphere: early in the morning it is warmer than in the evening, while it should be the other way round.

«Although seas have risen and warmed, and the atmosphere now holds more moisture, we can't yet draw definitive conclusions about the influence of climate change on Hurricane Harvey.

The atmosphere is warm and cozy, yet casual and fun.

Hobson and his director of photography, Lukas Ettlin, create a dreary yet warm aesthetic, and the camerawork is reserved, inspired by the subtle performances and atmosphere.

Villa Flamboyant has a warm and cozy atmosphere that makes it feels like home, a special architectural and landscape design that brings private yet intimate and tranquil feeling that make Villa Flamboyant really feels like home.

Warm hues give way to a comfortable yet refined atmosphere ideal for weddings, conferences and other events in The Crystal Room.

Magoebaskloof Mountain Estate offers you a uniquely, yet warm and friendly atmosphere.

The sumptuous and elegant furnishings create a warm, yet refined atmosphere.

Beautifully appointed Georgian villa with a grand, yet warm and welcoming atmosphere.

Because the last time there was that much CO2 in the atmosphere Earth, including California, was a much warmer and very different place from what it is now, yet all of our infrastructure has been built to cope with the climate we have now.

If the temperature doesn't decline with height in that layer (perhaps because of solar heating), it is still the case that increasing the LW optical thickness will, by concentrating the source of OLR into a yet thinner layer at the top of the atmosphere, remove some of the cooling of the lower part of the original OLR source (by adding additional downward LW flux from above, replacing the darkness of space), thus tending to cause warming there.

Remobilization to the atmosphere of only a small fraction of the methane held in East Siberian Arctic Shelf (ESAS) sediments could trigger abrupt climate warming, yet it is believed that sub-sea permafrost acts as a lid to keep this shallow methane reservoir in place.

The new report — the first of three comprehensive studies to come out this year — makes one of the strongest claims yet in support of the hypothesis that human activity, namely the relentless pumping of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, is what's behind climate change — an effect climate scientists refer to as anthropogenic global warming.

This finding, announced in September by the EU Joint Research Center and the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, doesn't mean that the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has yet decreased, but it could mean that we may be able to meet the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement in slowing global warming.

If part of the 1910 - 40 warming was, say, the atmosphere being warmed by the ocean (because, say, the ocean had not yet cooled down since the warmer period prior to 1900) then one wouldn't expect to see a lag.

Yet on all datasets, the atmosphere is warming at less than half the rate originally predicted by their fellow - activists at the error - prone Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — who have a vested interest in overstating the supposed extent of our influence on climate.

I am yet to hear scientific evidence to satisfy me that if the very, very small amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (approximately 0.38 per cent) was increased, it could lead to significant global warming.

I don't know about heat sloshed under the poles but I need a slosh of scotch heat after this; since you know Bob well you will know he has discussed a reemergence mechanism to explain how the ocean can put heat into the atmosphere in an El Nino year yet keep warming itself; and despite the fact that the oceans are a complex eddying mess the fact remains that AGW is a top down heater; if the oceans were going to be heated by AGW a shallow ocean would be heating; but it ain't:

They found that, as humans burn ever more fossil fuels to release ever higher levels of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, to stoke yet further global warming and trigger catastrophic climate change, all 571 cities will experience ever greater heatwaves: that is, three consecutive days and nights at which temperatures are about as high as they have ever been for that city.

Half of the warming in the 20th century occurred before CO2 was a problem, yet no on in the scientific community has a reason for this, and the pause has continued with an increase of 8 % of CO2 in the atmosphere, there is still no credible explanation for it, and it actually took the climate science community over a decade to admit there was one.

We are merely re-releasing a tiny portion of the trapped CO2 that was once part of the atmosphere and it wasn't too warm then and we are still in a state of impoverishment of atmospheric CO2, yet nitwits preach «Runaway warming» & «Tipping Points».

Humans are continuing to put carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, yet the planet is not warming and may even be cooling.

The «burner» in global warming is represented by the heat - trapping emissions released to the atmosphere from the burning of coal, oil, and natural gas — and since that burner has not (yet!)

As the aerosol particles rise on the warm, convecting air, they produce more rain over northern India and the Himalayan foothill, which further warms the atmosphere and fuels a «heat pump» that draws yet more warm air to the region.

But it is surely also true that an atmosphere warmed at its base by conduction will transmit that heat throughout the atmospheric column, maintaining its temperature and lapse rate, yet with most of the molecules in that column having the same kinetic energy (the same heat, but not the same temperature).

Therefore, the theory that adding CO2 to the atmosphere causes the Earth to warm, would seem to be as yet unproven.

Yet despite all the complexities, a firm and ever - growing body of evidence points to a clear picture: the world is warming, this warming is due to human activity increasing levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, and if emissions continue unabated the warming will too, with increasingly serious consequences.

For us in Colorado, the changes are not yet as obvious as in the Arctic, but the basic physics of the atmosphere tells us that a warming world will have serious consequences for our snowpack and water supply.

Thus, a warmer ocean has less capacity to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, yet still experiences ocean acidification.

So, the atmosphere is not warming, yet the greenhouse gasses now mysteriously have found a way to warm the bottom of the ocean.

Measurement is vital as we unravel the puzzle of warming, and the patterns of ocean, atmosphere and external influence that we don't yet understand.

So, we then have the solar input passing straight through yet a further 33 being recycled up and down through the atmosphere which gives a warmer surface but no change in top of atmosphere energy balance.

You still keep stating that there is no specific such thing as AGW but in the other thread you demonstrated that you don't d not even understand the mechanism by which CO2 warms the atmosphere so clearly you are not (yet) bringing any meaningful discussion on that point.

You might say that «extra» heat is stored in the atmosphere because it hasn't radiated out yet, and may warm the earth slightly at night.

Given historical climate and physics, the only way that implicit endorsement means «implicitly endors [ing] that humans are a cause of warming» where «a» is something less than primary (that is, over half) is if there is some as - yet undiscovered sink absorbing human CO2 emissions and, simultaneously, an as - yet undiscovered source of CO2 that is releasing it into the atmosphere - and moreover, the CO2 from this mysterious source just happens to possess a carbon isotope signature that matches fossil fuel CO2 as a total coincidence.

The limitations of OLS on data with a near unit root is well taken, but to claim that the temperature just changes stochastically, within bounds that are very far off what one would expect just from natural variability, is not convincing: Many parameters of the earth system are simultaneously showing signs of warming, plus there's still a positive radiation imbalance at the top of the atmosphere: The earth hasn't even warmed up yet to the full extent that the change in forcing implies.

Yet, I'm being told constantly that this colder atmosphere radiates energy which adds to the heat of the Earth and only needs a tiny tiny extra bit more of CO2 and the whole Earth's temperature will go up several degrees and this will lead to runaway global warming, because in this is a net exchange of energy which includes from the colder to the hotter.

Yet some people all too readily abandon logic and take that to mean that increasing CO2 in the absence of a initial change in insolation will not warm the atmosphere and thereby change climate.

The paleo record is not at all ambiguous: as temperature rose in response to natural increases in insolation more GHGs were released into the atmosphere (mainly CO2, CH4, and H2O), and then those GHGs induced yet more warming, which released yet more GHGs, etc., until equilibrium — and a warmer climate — was reached.

Today we're just skipping that first natural warming step by injecting GHGs directly into the atmosphere, which is already inducing warming, which will result in yet more GHGs being released naturally, etc., until equilibrium — and a warmer climate — is reached.

Moreover, warming of 2 C has now become quite likely, barring either prompt and drastic reductions in emissions, or deployment of some as - yet unproven technology to actively draw CO2 out of the atmosphere.

In addition, if a hotter ocean were the source of CO2, oxygen would be coming out of solution as well, yet the concentration of oxygen in the atmosphere is actually decreasing, not increasing (sources: Environmental Chemistry.com's CO2 Pollution and Global Warming page and IPCC Working Group 1 Report, Chapter 2, pages 138 - 139).

It has been seen that substantial increases in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and global climate warming have occurred cyclically, even when there was as yet no industrial action on nature.

So, yet again, this is global warming: Figure 1: Land, atmosphere, and ice heating (red), 0 - 700 meter ocean heat content (OHC) increase (light blue), 700 - 2,000 meter OHC increase (dark blue).

CO2 in the atmosphere has been slowly but steadily rising, yet the warming has been so minor over the past 20 years it looks like a plateau — which is what has sparked all the talk about a global warming pause or hiatus.