Not exact matches
Board members are volunteers who advise the
Youth Bureau on matters of positive youth development, delinquency prevention, and runaway and homeless y
Youth Bureau
on matters of positive
youth development, delinquency prevention, and runaway and homeless y
youth development,
delinquency prevention, and runaway and homeless
youthyouth.
In 1955, Tennessee Senator Estes Kefauver (David Straithairn) chairs the open televised hearings of the Senate Subcommittee to Investigate Juvenile
Delinquency, to examine the impact of pornography
on America's
youth.
As a coalition of
youth agencies called
on the Congress this month to continue the federal programs that deal with juvenile
delinquency, a group of academic researchers released a report that appeared to buttress the argument that many federally funded programs designed to combat juvenile
delinquency have been successful.
Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) This study examined an intensive mentoring program that focuses
on youth deemed at - risk for juvenile delinquency or mental illness [now called Friends for Youth Mentoring Servi
youth deemed at - risk for juvenile
delinquency or mental illness [now called Friends for
Youth Mentoring Servi
Youth Mentoring Services].
Community - based interventions
Delinquency - prevention programs in community settings can be created for various purposes such as diverting
youth out of the juvenile justice system, serving
youth placed
on informal or formal probation, or serving
youth on parole who are returning to the community after a residential placement.
In 1999, the Federal Bureau of Investigation estimated that there were 2.5 million arrests of juveniles.1 In1997, juvenile courts handled almost 1 800 000
delinquency cases.2
On an average day, more than 106 000
youth are in custody in juvenile facilities.3 Almost60 % of detained
youth are African American or Hispanic.3 Moreover, recent changes in the laws, such as mandatory penalties for drug crimes and lowering the age that juveniles can be tried as adults, have resulted in more juveniles serving time than ever before.
Wim Meeus and several colleagues report that parental influence
on adolescent offending is strongest when an adolescent has no intimate partners; parental support did not influence
delinquency for
youth who consistently had a romantic partner over the course of the six - year study.88 In another recent study of serious adolescent offenders, girls who self - reported delinquent behavior were more likely to be strongly encouraged in that behavior by their current romantic partner.89 Interestingly, the association between partner encouragement and self - reported offending was strongest among
youth reporting warm relationships with their opposite - sex parent.
Permanency Through Collaboration Between
Delinquency and Dependency Courts (PDF - 880 KB) National Child Welfare Resource Center
on Legal and Judicial Issues, ABA Center
on Children and the Law Child CourtWorks, 10 (2), 2008 Describes efforts in Idaho to bridge the gap between child welfare and juvenile justice proceedings to assist
youth with cases pending simultaneously in both systems.
Funding for the current study was provided by the Penn State Children,
Youth, and Families Consortium and a grant from the Pennsylvania Commission
on Crime and
Delinquency to Centre County Communities That Care ® (CTC).
This multisite randomized controlled trial examines the impact of a 12 - year long professional
youth mentoring program, Friends of the Children (FOTC),
on boys and girls who were identified during kindergarten as at the highest risk and lowest protection for future problems, including antisocial behavior and
delinquency.
«Fast Track Intervention Effects
on Youth Arrests and
Delinquency.»
Fact: «Although early research suggests that
youth living in two - parent biological families fare better
on a range of developmental outcomes than those in single - parent or alternative structures (Amato and Keith, 1991), this research typically finds that effects of family structure
on developmental outcomes such as
delinquency are not strong (Hetherington and Kelly, 2002)... More tangible differences in family dynamics or circumstances — such as supervision practices — are largely responsible when study groups have different outcomes... The highest rates of
delinquency were for
youth in father - only households, followed by father - stepmother...»
This finding is in line with findings of a meta - analysis
on effective ingredients of prevention programs for
youth at risk for juvenile
delinquency, which also showed that preventive interventions of shorter duration were more effective than preventive interventions of longer duration (De Vries et al. 2015).
The results indicate that, for both African American and European American
youth, low parental control influences
delinquency indirectly through its effect
on deviant peer affiliation, whereas maternal support has both direct and indirect effects.
Support for the Rochester
Youth Development Study and the Rochester Intergenerational Study has been provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R01CE001572), the Office of Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention (2006 - JW - BX - 0074, 86 - JN - CX - 0007, 96 - MU - FX - 0014, 2004 - MU - FX - 0062), the National Institute
on Drug Abuse (R01DA020195, R01DA005512), the National Science Foundation (SBR - 9123299), and the National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH56486, R01MH63386).
Interventions are drawn from family - focused interventions rated as Model Plus, Model, or Promising
on the Blueprints for Healthy
Youth Development Web site (http://www.colorado.edu/cspv/blueprints/) based
on evidence of their effectiveness in reducing child externalizing behaviors, substance use, and / or
delinquency.