Once all stakeholder feedback,
youth outcomes data, and quality assessment data is collected and analyzed, give key program stakeholders a chance to respond to it and use it to plan for next summer.
Not exact matches
Separately, BLOCS works to collect Social and Emotional Learning (SEL)
data from approximately 52 of these 75 sites using the Survey of Academic and
Youth Outcomes (SAYO - Y).
This summit focuses on state and district implementation of the federal (ESSA) and the opportunity to realize the power of chronic absence
data to develop systems of support that improve student attendance and other important
youth outcomes.
Local educators, in partnership with other stakeholders, can then use an ongoing
data based decision - making model utilizing secondary transition
data related to graduation (Indicator 1), dropout (Indicator 2), transition compliance of the IEP (Indicator 13), and post-school
outcomes (Indicator 14) to improve in - school transition programs for
youth with disabilities.
The Center assists SEAs to develop and implement rigorous and practical post-school
outcome data systems to track the early adult experiences of
youth who had IEPs while in high school.
It also helps states collect, analyze, and use post-school
outcome data to improve the quality of secondary and transition programs for
youth with disabilities.
The consolidation of
data from disparate systems and the sharing of
data across agencies and organizations that serve MNPS students and families are key strategies that Hansen champions in her efforts to improve
outcomes for Nashville's children and
youth through a collective impact approach.
This workshop will describe how social and emotional assessment
data can help foster positive
outcomes in the
youth you serve.
To support school capacity - building, IDRA's Coca - Cola Valued
Youth Program has developed online evaluation and coordination portals that give schools more immediate access to student
outcome data for decision - making.
Provides
data (surveys, records, and observations) that demonstrate progress toward desired
youth outcomes, such as improved peer relationships or self - management
Assessments emphasized
youth self - report but with established reliable measures.49 - 51, 68
Data on longer - term
outcomes are needed to clarify the sustainability of intervention effects after discontinuing intervention resources.
Historically, mental health care providers (Henggeler, 1994) and juvenile justice authorities (Henggeler, 1996) have not been required to provide consumers, the public, or funders with
data on the
outcomes for the
youth and families they serve.
The following resources address how the use of
data improves
outcomes for children,
youth, and families, including State and local examples.
The
data collected include information on
outcomes of child abuse reports, numbers availing of family support services, numbers and categories of children in care, numbers availing of
youth homelessness services, and services for separated children seeking asylum.
Examining African American Fathers» Involvement in Permanency Planning: An Effort to Reduce Racial Disproportionality in the Child Welfare System (PDF - 193 KB) Coakley (2008) Children and
Youth Services Review, 30 View Abstract Examines the extent to which African - American fathers» involvement in permanency planning influences children's placement
outcomes using a secondary
data analysis of child welfare case records.
Permanency
Outcomes of Children in Kinship and Non-Kinship Foster Care: Testing the External Validity of Kinship Effects Koh Children and
Youth Services Review, 32 (3), 2010 View Abstract Examines whether the effects of kinship care can be generalized across States by using Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS)
data obtained for five States that participated in the Fostering Court Improvement project: Arizona, Connecticut, Missouri, Ohio, and Tennessee.
Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley (R) created a children's cabinet by executive order in 2016.10 The cabinet serves as an advisory body on issues that the state's children face — formulating policy solutions and encouraging innovation.11 The cabinet focuses on developing a comprehensive strategy to early learning through a uniform approach to
data collection, quality assurance, and
outcomes measurement.12 The governor chairs the cabinet, which also includes the state superintendent for education, the commissioner for mental health, and the executive director for
youth services.
The study (1) briefly describes the Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) approach, (2) describes agency - wide implementation of CPS and the challenges this agency faced, (3) reports rates of S / R across two programs in which
data are available before and after adoption of CPS, and (4) presents an exploratory analysis of improved
youth outcomes that may support LeBel and Goldstein's assertion that reducing S / R contributes to improved
outcomes through redistribution of staff time into therapeutic activities.
Fact: «Using multiple techniques to control for background factors, we analyze 2,908 young children and 1,736 adolescents and young adults in the National Longitudinal Survey of
Youth (NLSY79) and the NLSY79 Children and Young Adults (CNLSY79)
data sets to examine whether early childbearing causes children's
outcomes.
The following
data describes treatment
outcome maintenance results from a randomized clinical trial investigating the impact of a cognitive behavioral intervention Primary and Secondary Control Enhancement Therapy - Physical Illness (PASCET - PI) as compared to treatment as usual (TAU) on
youths with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Lastly, it is crucial that further research includes follow - up
data to investigate the long term negative
outcomes of
youths scoring high on psychopathic traits in, for example, contacts with family, relationships, school / work and living situation.