Sentences with phrase «zero evidence»

Since there is zero evidence of expensive housing trickling down to become affordable housing in Los Angeles, the density hawks then invoke another out - of - context economic theory: supply - and - demand.

So I did an extensive internet search, and found zero evidence that van der Kolk personally had anything to do with the fraudulent cases.

Ironically, Facebook has been repeatedly accused of this same snooping behavior, despite zero evidence that it was actually going on.

The Law Society has produced ZERO evidence that the SoP's intrusion on licencees expression is rationally connected to its objective of reducing «systemic racism in the profession» (whether it exists or not), and whether it is proportionate response to such a problem.

There is zero evidence of that.

If there's zero evidence that skeptic scientists / speakers are industry - paid liars, then there is no need for common citizens and journalists to ignore the work of the skeptics.

If not, then you are falsely defaming people as «heartless zealots» based on zero evidence.

One can claim it is rice, but the fact CH4 is rising at the same rate globally is zero evidence of this, and not contrary evidence of increasing polar emissions.

As to your other assertion (which, by the way, you should indicate with quotes, block quotes, etc. what is yours and what is Raypierre's), there is zero evidence that any Grand Solar Minimum is in any danger of putting us into a Snowball Earth scenario.

Once again, you have proven your idiocy by having zero evidence to back your argument.

And there is still zero evidence of any global harm as the result of the increase in that beneficial trace gas.

There is zero evidence in support of his many predictions of even wrong».

I simply point out the fact that there is zero evidence of global harm due to CO2, and that CO2 enhances plant growth; therefore CO2 is harmless and beneficial.

I simply pointed out the fact that there is zero evidence of global harm due to CO2, and that CO2 enhances plant growth; therefore CO2 is harmless and beneficial.

As you have continually shown, there is ZERO evidence that CO2 causes warming in a convective atmosphere or of oceans.

A Washington Post article which contains the words «conspiracy theories» in its very first sentence and ends with a list of funders for a CEI dinner...... while providing zero evidence proving the donations were part of a pay - for - performance arrangement for fabricated lies, in a manner not one bit different than Ozone Action did two decades earlier.

There is zero evidence for that claim.

Or if we assume average global temperature is currently 15 C, that by 2075 that average global temperature will be 17 C. First there is zero evidence of this happening and second one could assume one will first get 1 C increase in global temperature.

In the approach to the model / observation discrepancy, we see the same sort of willful blindness that the evidence does not support the model outputs to the extent that the models provide zero evidence to support AGW.

So far, there's zero evidence that it has.

There is zero evidence that «climate change» has increased the probability of setting temperature records»

Therefore we have zero evidence for forcing feedback either way.

There is ZERO evidence that anyone at paris even considered K15..

As their is zero evidence of Hansen [s insane propaganda, you demeen yourself by your several posts «defending the indefensible.»

First off, there is essentially zero evidence to link emissions to sea level rise.

There is zero evidence that an increase in undersea volcanos are causing the constant trend in CO2 that matches the emissions of mans CO2.

More CO2 [«carbon»] is beneficial for the biosphere, and there is zero evidence showing that a little more of that beneficial trace gas is harmful in any way.

«Science is never settled, but the current state of «climate change» science is quite clear: There is essentially zero evidence that carbon dioxide from human activities is causing catastrophic climate change.»

I suppose your largest fear should be a rapid increase in the rate of sea level rise, but somehow there is ZERO evidence of an increase in the rate since we have has reasonably reliable means of measurements.

Sea level is rising at only1.5 mm per year now (six inches per century), they note, and there is zero evidence that the rate is escalating or that coastal communities are at risk.

«There's zero evidence of any influence whatsoever,» he told me.

The point is that there is zero evidence of an alternative cause of the current warming.

While anyone is entitled to their opinion, you proved exactly zero evidence.

Now you say that you know and accept the science but simply reject it despite presenting zero evidence to favor rejection.

At this point we have absolutely zero evidence that any public policies have the capacity to produce a net gain of land based carbon biomass.

There is zero evidence that net feedbacks are negative, in fact the evidence says they are significantly positive.

Fact: There is absolutely zero evidence that contraindicates the above.

BPL may also be so constrained, but it appears his employer has no issues if he falsely and publicly accuses others of being «traitors» or worse with zero evidence.

And while the A.I. does a good job of staying out of multi-car pileups, there were plenty of occasions when we traded paint on a hairpin only to see zero evidence of it.

There is literally ZERO evidence to show that the decision to go 900p / 30 fps was to accommodate one console over the other.

And yet, these members of the media had made the accusation with zero evidence.

I swear, at this point Nintendo could title it «All - New Super Smash Bros 5 Not The Wii U Game» and people would still insist it's a port despite having zero evidence for that assumption.

And now with many shelters around the country actively promoting low - cost adoptions, there has been zero evidence that such adoption promotions attract animal abusers to shelters.

There is zero evidence that any dog needs to be revaccinated once he's protected... and there's oodles of evidence showing that he's likely protected for life.

And currently, there is ZERO evidence that extending hold periods increases overall lifesaving — while there is abundant evidence that decreasing length of stay is imperative to lifesaving.

There is zero evidence that supports banning certain types of dogs actually lowers incidents of dog bites in the U.S. — zero.

There is as yet zero evidence of this anywhere I can see.

If you don't know what that means, rest assured that you can't clone the soul of a dog, as Barbra Streisand wrote for The Times, assuming a dog can have a soul, which you can assume, or not, based on zero evidence either way.

I have seen absolutely zero evidence of this.

Josh writes, There is zero evidence of a long - term correlation between stocks and the dollar.