They transform a passive system into an aggressive
zonal defense.
A zonal defense is often passive because the players need to maintain a preferred team shape.
did u see how manc lined up against
our zonal defense?
If Bould is doing such a good job why are we still playing
zonal defense?!? I'll tell you why — because anyone who disagrees with our cancer of a manger will be left without a job.
Not exact matches
Zonal marking, No CDM, No substitutions, Super light in numbers on
Defense.
Zonal marking is better for our style of football where we need to transit from
defense to attack quickly, and so every player should already be in position when we get the ball back.
ozil had a bad game but who was at fault for our 2 goals our
defense especially flamini he isn't simply good enough while city had fernandinho who made several interceptions we need to change the
zonal marking system & switch 2 man 2 man marking + need a wc cdm wenger himself admietted in an interview that he wanted a player similar 2 viera
By using
zonal marking, we have given players for given areas at the set pieces gives the opposition the opportunity to exploit our weaknesses in
defense, such as having Skrtel, the stronger header in Liverpool on Chambers, a 19 year old unexperienced, weak header / defender.
Liverpool use a
zonal marking style of
defense when defending such routines and this will not have been lost on O'Neill.