The bill would create 50 - metre
zones around clinics to keep away people who would harass patients and staff.
Not exact matches
Massachusetts is beefing up security
around abortion
clinics and scrambling for a legal fix after the U.S. Supreme Court voided the state's buffer
zone law that kept protesters 35 feet away, saying it violated freedom of speech.
It follows a similar move in Ealing, which voted for buffer
zones around an abortion
clinic in west London to stop protesters gathering outside.
A number of justices raised concerns about a Massachusetts state law preventing activists from crossing a 35 - foot buffer
zone around reproductive health
clinics.
They were, in Justice Scalia's words, to «be taught a lesson»» a lesson the Court forcefully applied in Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc., which created,
around abortion
clinics, a
zone in which pro-choice advocates were free to demonstrate but even peaceful abortion protesters were subject to arrest.
One proposal would see a «buffer
zone» placed
around the
clinic meaning protesters wouldn't be allowed within a certain distance.
«As attorney general, he successfully fought to protect and expand buffer
zones around health
clinics so that families would be safe from intimidation and harassment.»
Anti-abortion-rights demonstrators stand outside the U.S. Supreme Court in 2014 after oral arguments over buffer
zones around abortion
clinics.
Bill 9 would create minimum 50 metre no - protest
zones around abortion
clinics.
Watson and Spratt challenged the Access to Abortion Services Act, which creates a no - protest («bubble»)
zone around abortion
clinics to allow women access to
clinic services free of unwanted approaches by anti-abortion protesters.