Therefore, conceptually, if two people already - as universally supported - don't necessarily have the same voting weight (you can have a vote taken away from you for presumably doing wrong to society), what is the moral / philosophical argument against having select people being given additional votes for presumably doing more than average for society? (politics.stackexchange.com)
Borough presidents appoint two additional voting members who are district residents or who own or operate a business in the district. (uft.org)
SB 441 by Sen. Ron Calderon, D - Montebello, is scheduled for reconsideration this Wednesday but even the author does not appear optimistic he will find the one additional vote needed to move the bill along. (k-12daily.org)