Currently, abuse of dominance need only be proven on the civil standard of balance of probabilities. (thelitigator.ca)
Even the proof relationship (as in, proof on balance of probability, and proof beyond reasonable doubt) can be an inductive relationship, and hence we can be in the unfortunate situation of having proof beyond reasonable doubt of a proposition which is in fact false. (realclimate.org)
However, even on a civil balance of probabilities test, there must be clear, cogent, and convincing evidence to support a termination. (blg.com)