Here, however, we see an additional approach that entails attempts to discredit the scientists who produce the evidence, and it is this phenomenon that is exceptionally prominent in climate science debates. (judithcurry.com)
Climate science debates occur every day in the blogosphere and on cable news shows, but this particular fight about a major temperature record (and therefore, major news story) highlights the extent to which many boil down to mere contradiction and rejections of facts, rather than arguments based on competing lines of evidence. (mashable.com)
For if a proper climate science debate is actually held, the public would soon realize that there is insufficient data of any kind — temperature, land and sea ice, glaciers, sea level, extreme weather, ocean pH, et cetera — to be able to determine how today's climate differs from the past, much less predict the future. (newsobserver.com)