As Copenhagen Consensus director Bjorn Lomborg recently pointed out in The Wall Street Journal, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is guilty of many of the same conceptual errors in the way it uses the word «subsidies.» (exxonmobilperspectives.com)
By my count, the «corrected» paper still has 4 gross conceptual errors, 2 patently invalid assumptions and introduces a monumentally absurd definition of the newly minted Equilibrium Efficacy. (climateaudit.org)
I think it is because they well know (but will not admit) that the science behind the AGW hypothesis is ripe with conceptual errors and, in the long run, be proven to be wrong.» (gelbspanfiles.com)