So I give this dialogue 0 chance of achieving anything but the same «He says, She says» teeter - totter see saw of a ton weighing consensus scientists on one side matched by a few feather weight dissenters swinging the narrow board up and down regardless of physics. (realclimate.org)
i agree that is how it should work, but this situation is very asymmetrical for consensus scientists versus those who challenge the consensus. (judithcurry.com)
My point is if consensus scientists refuse to debate, they will continue to loose the public. (judithcurry.com)