The other statements seems to accurately portray conslusions of the Jones paper (aerosols and other natural variability caused us to warm slightly less than expected by balancing / off - setting a portion of the GHG - caused energy gain), but your wording above seems to have confused some folks. (skepticalscience.com)
But they also have a lot of conslusions that either seem to contradict or neither support not contradict your claims. (nakedpastor.com)
(Praying we wouldn't run into each other in the elevator, dodging questions about the other in emails and meetings, not seeing mutual friends, etc.) And before anyone jumps to conslusions, it was absolutely nothing malicious and neither of us did anything «wrong.» (bowsandsequins.com)