The Court found that the facts pleaded in the struck paragraphs were material to the claims, that the Master lacked jurisdiction to decide whether the paragraphs were necessary, and that the Master failed to apply correct legal test. (dww.com)
The issue arose on the first appellant's appeal as to whether the tribunal had applied the correct legal test for a finding of dishonesty in proceedings. (newlawjournal.co.uk)
The Netherlands Supreme Court concluded that the Court of Appeal had applied the correct legal tests and, accordingly, denied Mr. Maximov's appeal. (globalarbitrationnews.com)