Both Sharma and Bining, as well as Gleeson, kindly stayed for a few minutes after the hearing to take questions from students about the differences between the reasonableness and correctness standards of review, what it means to certify a question for appeal and how frequently immigration matters receive leave to appeal at the Federal Court (only 20 per cent to 30 per cent of matters make it past the threshold for leave). (canadianlawyermag.com)
As Annis J. put it in David v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 FC 358, where the question was «whether the acknowledged requirement of thoroughness of an investigation by the Commission is to be considered as part of the reasonableness analysis or whether it is a matter of procedural fairness subject to a correctness standard of review» (at para. 53), (administrativelawmatters.com)
On August 4, 2016, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Intact v. Allstate [1] and changed the correctness standard of review for appeals from private arbitrations to one... (samislaw.com)