If the institution of higher education can prove falsifying data for a paper in a peer reviewed journal that might do it. (tamino.wordpress.com)
It is quite disturbing that the data for a paper that is so widely cited is apparently lost. (judithcurry.com)
Under the Author Information section of an article in Nature last week (August 5), there was a highly irregular reference to an unusual number of extensive contributors: «Foldit players (more than 57,000) contributed extensively through their feedback and gameplay, which generated the data for this paper.» (slaw.ca)