It's useful to think of this as an example of Bayesian priors in action — given that 99 % of the criticisms we hear about climate science are bogus or based on deep confusions about what modeling is for, scepticism is an appropriate first response, but because we are actually scientists, not shills, we are happy to correct real errors — sometimes they will matter, and sometimes they won't. (realclimate.org)
Hermeneutical reflections often leave believers in deep confusion about how to bring these ancient writings to bear on the present life of the church. (religion-online.org)
given that 99 % of the criticisms we hear about climate science are bogus or based on deep confusions about what modeling is for (climateaudit.org)