Markey further pressed Boyce on Peabody Energy's petition for reconsideration of the EPA Endangerment Finding for greenhouse gases, asking for a straight answer on the validity of the science. (climatesciencewatch.org)
There are of course many individuals who oppose the EPA endangerment finding for two main reasons, (i) they oppose any steps to reduce our dependency on fossil fuels and (ii) they oppose any government regulations. (skepticalscience.com)
If views opposed to the scientific basis of climate alarmism had been actively encouraged prior to the approval of the GHG Endangerment Finding in 2009, we would be far better off now and might well have saved many hundreds of billions if not trillions of dollars that the Obama Administration wasted on climate alarmist policies with no valid scientific basis (see also here). (carlineconomics.com)