Orexim's s. 423 and declaration claims did not show a good arguable case of falling within a jurisdictional gateway. (st-philipsstone.com)
It had to establish a good arguable case that the parties concluded the alleged jurisdictional agreement. (newlawjournal.co.uk)
The issues included whether or not the claimant had established that each cause of action in respect of which he claimed stood a reasonable prospect of success for the purposes of CPR 6.20 and 6.21 and whether, in respect of each of his claims, he had a good arguable case that the claim fell within one or more of the types of claim specified in CPR 6.20. (newlawjournal.co.uk)