Hence, nothing outside the mind of the observer can be rationally confirmed. (religion.blogs.cnn.com)
If that is not a powerful and relevant correlation, then I don't know what could count as evidence against actual randomness in the mind of an observer. (firstthings.com)
In that «realist» tradition the intelligible actuality of a thing is not a projection from the mind of the observer — as in Kant and the subjective schools that come from him — but is an intrinsic aspect of the thing itself. (faith.org.uk)