The district judge decided that Miller's original injury claim was incapable of being shown to have any value and struck out the negligence actions against the solicitors, despite the fact that the witnesses» evidence had not been tested at a trial, because there was no sensible prospect that their evidence could make any difference to the conclusion. (newlawjournal.co.uk)
but that has nothing to do with the original injury. (sbnation.com)
Doctors and trainers have said that a jarring of the artificial hip could tear it out of its socket, causing more severe damage to the left leg than the original injury did. (si.com)