There are a few publishing scientists that strongly disagree with the established consensus that humans are the primary drivers of modern climate change and yet they seem to find funding without much difficulty. (planet3.org)
Because that number came from an online survey that had 77 published scientists answer «yes» to a vague question. (globalclimatescam.com)
The other part of this («authors with something extra to say») etc. is less controversial, but I wonder whether many publishing scientists would find this very interesting. (realclimate.org)