... to say that the current rate of change of temperature did not occur in the past 11,000 years is in fact correct! (realclimate.org)
I reviewed Mann's method, and found that the statistical bias he applied was for temperatures proportional to the time rate of change of temperatures, which defines an exponential function of temperature independent of the initial data. (notrickszone.com)
Sure, combining all these is helpful and gives a picture of the past, but to say that the current rate of change of temperature did not occur in the past 11,000 years is laughable. (realclimate.org)