JUSTICE STEVENS, joined by JUSTICE BRENNAN and JUSTICE MARSHALL, dissented from the order directing reargument in New Jersey v. T.L.O.. (law.cornell.edu)
JUSTICE STEVENS concedes that reargument of this case «might enable some of us to have a better informed view of a problem that has been percolating in the courts for several years.» (law.cornell.edu)
At the very least, this important case reversing centuries of history and experience ought to be set for reargument next Term. (law.cornell.edu)