By contrast, changes such as reducing the number of hereditary peers in 1999 have been effective, as have retirement provisions introduced in 2015. (theguardian.com)
Partners who have not made adequate retirement provision could end up in a situation where they can not afford to retire. (legalweek.com)
The Supreme Court of Canada decision in McCormick v. Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, mentioned recently by Simon Chester, will have implications beyond just how human rights legislation applies to mandatory retirement provisions in partnership agreements. (slaw.ca)