In a few years, as we get to understand this more, skeptics will move on (just like they dropped arguments about the hockey stick and about the surface station record) to their next reason not to believe climate science. (dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com)
For the purposes of this article I will ignore the Urban Heat Island effect that seems to have contaminated the surface station record as a result of poor recording site management and surrounding development over many years. (newclimatemodel.com)
There's no evidence in the surface station record that there's a trend in the loss of nightly cooling since the 1950's. (judithcurry.com)