Denying climate change isn't scepticism — it's «motivated reasoning» True sceptics test a hypothesis against the evidence, but climate sceptics refuse to accept anything that contradicts their beliefs (climate-resistance.org)
BTW, GaryM, please aim your objections to the «is consistent» line of argument at Jim Cripwell too — or would that amount to some kind of social taboo amongst True Sceptics? (judithcurry.com)