My point is that there's nothing surprising about police officers who consider the exact wording of the statute (in this case, the requiement to signal a lane change) to be only mildly relevant to what they want to charge. (slaw.ca)
But the question remains whether the majority of the Supreme Court will consider prosecuting a commercial fisherman under SOX a «curious» enough case to justify looking beyond the unambiguous words of the statute. (floridaappellatereview.com)
Since DUI laws (including underage DUI laws) and the precise wording of each statute vary from state to state, the Canadian admissibility of an individual can also depend on the US state in which the offense happened. (canadaduientrylaw.com)