The anthropogenic global warming hypothesis says ocean heat should increase fairly steadily and uninterrupted (monotonic), barring any volcanic eruptions
Finally, given the limitations of climate science (one Earth and all) they should describe what they would consider convincing evidence in favor of
the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis.
And finally, I asked you for some empirical evidence that a) demonstrates
the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis; b) that was not based on computer models; and c) is not dependent on unsubstantiated correlation.
Like
the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis (AGW), research continued in spite of media and political acceptance.
What is often forgotten is that the UN established the IPCC in 1988 only because of the then raging scientific debate over the veracity of
the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis.
Well, in a nutshell,
the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis, which is at the center of modern climate - doomsday scenarios, can not explain the powerful warming of the past.
You write: «And, speaking of short periods of time on which to be drawing conclusions:
the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis, correlating carbon dioxide increases with temperature increases, is based on only about 23 years — 1975 - 1998.
And, speaking of short periods of time on which to be drawing conclusions:
the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis, correlating carbon dioxide increases with temperature increases, is based on only about 23 years — 1975 - 1998.
The IPCC set up a system to prove
the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis.
The climate «FactCheck» summary: the world's climate has experienced a declining ocean warming rate since the 1940s, which contradicts the «consensus»
anthropogenic global warming hypothesis, per NOAA.
Therefore,
the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is either false or fundamentally inadequate
The anthropogenic global warming hypothesis says ocean heat should increase fairly steadily and uninterrupted (monotonic), barring any volcanic eruptions
IAC, the issues in
the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis are considerably more complex than just yes or no.
There is the following science consensus:
the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis has never been empirically validated outside the confines of a computer simulation.
Conclusion: For a tipping point and / or runaway warming to be reached, and then survive,
the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis demands that the lower troposphere warms in a consistent and accelerating mode, due to the hypothetical positive atmospheric feedbacks supposedly produced from fossil fuel CO2 emissions.
You write: «And, speaking of short periods of time on which to be drawing conclusions:
the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis, correlating carbon dioxide increases with temperature increases, is based on only about 23 years -1975-1998.
Though I have other problems with
the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis, I have never really doubted that the world has warmed up over the last century.