Sentences with phrase «convincing scientific evidence»

Despite convincing scientific evidence that generic drugs are largely equivalent to pioneer meds, there remains an undercurrent of fear toward nonbrand names.

This is all standard, mainline Christian theology and it all gets utterly demolished by convincing scientific evidence of God.

Many people complain about poor sleep around the full moon, and now a report appearing in Current Biology, a Cell Press publication, on July 25 offers some of the first convincing scientific evidence to suggest that this really is true.

Despite the convincing scientific evidence many mothers are unaware that breastfeeding reduces their risk of breast cancer.

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate.

But Field has also not explained why he signed a petition stating * that there was «no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the earth's atmosphere and disruption of the earth's climate.»

The petition read: «There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the earth's atmosphere and disruption of the earth's climate.

«There is no convincing scientific evidence that human contribution to greenhouse gases is causing dangerous global warming,» it stated in an official declaration in 2009.

The OISM petition project declared there was «no convincing scientific evidence» that greenhouse gas emissions would cause catastrophic climate change.

«There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate,» the petition states.

Over 31,000 scientists signed the OISM Petition Project The Petition Project features over 31,000 scientists signing the petition stating «there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide will, in the forseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere».

Another regular of the PR campaign is the Oregon Petition, which urges US rejection of the Kyoto Protocol and claims there is «no convincing scientific evidence» for global warming.

, asks well - known scientist Art Robinson, who spearheaded The Petition Project which to date has gathered the signatures of 31,487 scientists who agree that there is «no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate.»

31,487 American scientists, including 9,029 with PhDs, have signed this petition, which includes: There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate.

The Petition Project features over 31,000 scientists signing the petition stating «There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere...»

There is no consensus The Petition Project features over 31,000 scientists signing the petition stating «There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide will, in the forseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere...».