Sentences with phrase «decade trend»

In recent decades a trend has emerged in the location of the most religious and least religious states.

While that is possible, the so - called Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) index that is used to characterize decadal and multi-decadal variability of the Pacific Ocean has not shown a significant increasing or decreasing three - decade trend from the 1980's to the 2000's (it's dominated by quasi-decadal fluctuation since 1980).

There is an increase of 0.035 C per decade in the Raw Nino 3.4 region data and a 0.023 C per decade trend in the Raw AMO data.

From the past decade the trend of Interracial Relationship is exponential increases, This growth of a multicultural society has acted around as a stimulus fueling interracial relationships in the US and around the globe.

This was significant, said Carrington, «because the rate of global warming from 2000 - 2009 is lower than the 0.16 C per decade trend seen since the late 1970s -LSB-...] the warming rate for the past 10 years is estimated at 0.08 - 0.16 C».

The only way, the last decade could not have been the «warmist ever», is if a cooling trend had set in over the whole decade, that was equal or greater than the previous warming decades trends.

QUESTION: If this hypothetical +0.03 C per decade trend line for the seven hottest peak years on record between 1998 and 2028 stayed within the CMIP5 min - max boundary line, as shown on the above graphic, could climate scientists justifiably claim in the year 2028 that «global warming» a.k.a. «climate change» had occurred on schedule according to AR5's climate model predictions?

The overall trend for March is positive, but the trend for the past 10 years (that is a full decade trend) is negative at -0.14 °C / decade.

«Very much the same results» isn't how I would describe a 0.1 K / decade trend attribution to UHI [Jones et al. 2008] compared to 0.05 K / century [Jones et al. 1990].

In fact, that NOAA decade trend calculation seems egregiously wrong and very misleading.

Over the past decade trends such as minimal increases in young family incomes, greater employment volatility, and welfare reform initiatives have placed economic pressure on parents to participate in the labour force, even when their children are very young.

In the upper right corner of the chart, NOAA shows its calculated per decade trend of -0.02 °F for a period that spans 1996 - 2018.

With regard to the 1979 - present spring trend over WAIS, the 0.30 °C / decade trend from the STEIGv2 reconstruction is a lower bound, because STEIGv2 utilized detrended AVHRR data to calibrate the reconstruction.

Obviously other cities have grown up around subways and trains to a much greater extent, but we all know that during recent decades the trend has been in the direction of Los Angeles.

Critics may complain that the company has strayed far from its wholesome roots but, without Whole Foods, it's hard to imagine many of the decades trends in food, from sustainable fishing to artisanal cheese, taking off as they have.

It's hard to fight half - decade trends; we'll see if new UF coach Dan Mullen or second - year Texas coach Tom Herman are up for the task.

This decade the trend has been on classics, such as the sort of names that crop up in Jane Austen books or spring from the Bible.

Over a decade the trend is cooling temperatures in the northern parts of Eurasia.

(1) The 0.155 C per decade trend reported here differs from the 0.13 C per decade trend recently reported in the Global Temperature Report, which is published monthly by UAH's Earth System Science Center.

After all, while we may indeed be entering a new phase of the charter school debate — one where charters have lost much of their luster — prudence suggests awaiting further confirmation before concluding we've just witnessed a sudden about - face in a two - decade trend.

I quantified the volcanic bias to account for about 0.04 C / decade of the 0.16 C / decade trend (global GISS land + ocean starting 1979).

Regarding the 100 year 0.07 C / decade trend.

The less than 0.1 degree C / decade trend — is pretty much consistent with any of a number of results some of which I have mentioned.

Of course, the «+0.096 K / decade trend» is not the entirety of Christy & McNader (2017)(which for some reason resides in a vault on the planet Wattsupia), but suggesting their adjusted trend could be over 100 % out does make a bit of a mess of their eventual bold conclusions.

Thus they convert a TLT record with a trend of +0.155 K / decade into an adjusted one with a +0.096 K / decade trend.

Let's add our 0.1 Deg C / decade trend to the Peninsula stations, shall we, and see what results:

And (nope, still not done with this game) EVEN STRANGER YET, if you add a whopping 0.5 Deg C / decade trend to Byrd (or five times what we added to the Peninsula), the S09 West Antarctic trend changes by... well... a mere 0.02 Deg C / decade, and the gridded trend at Byrd station rises massively from 0.25 to... well... 0.29.

Stranger yet, if you add a 0.1 Deg C / decade trend to the Peninsula stations, the S09 West Antarctic trend increases from 0.20 to 0.25 — with most of the increase occurring 2,500 km away from the Peninsula on the Ross Ice Shelf — the East Antarctic trend increases from 0.10 to 0.13... but the Peninsula trend only increases from 0.13 to 0.15.

And what happens if you add a 0.5 Deg C / decade trend to Byrd?