Sentences with phrase «end of history»

The lesson ideal for either the beginning, middle or end of a history topic or unit.

No matter what happens, he says, someone will be on the wrong end of history.

As I assess my own understanding of the kingdom, I find myself accepting all three, except for some serious questions about an apocalyptic end of history.

It is also more inclusive than just the insistence on «political freedom» which is central to current forms of liberal democracy and the «end of history thesis ``.

According to these interpreters, the passages in the teaching of Jesus which suggest that he expected the early end of history have been read back into his words by the later church, itself immersed in apocalyptic hopes and speculations.

Each is regarded as a creation of the divine which is fulfilled, and not annulled by the source and end of history which is rightly revered as divine.

End of History thinking is also present in those who take Huxley's BRAVE NEW WORLD as a serious warning about our future.

The Darwinian metaphor of evolution was used to express a faith in a Historical future, in either the coming end of History (Marx) or a more indefinite perfectibility in which our alienating technological progress would finally be ennobled by a corresponding moral progress (say, John Stuart Mill or Walt Whitman) that would be the source of the elusive human happiness promised by modern liberation.

These interpreters take the third meaning as normative and assert not only that Jesus expected the imminent and catastrophic end of history and the present world and God's establishment of a new order in which his righteous purpose would be perfectly fulfilled, but also that whenever he spoke of the «kingdom of God» he used the phrase in that sense and in that sense only.

If he really meant what he said (and one is almost certain to decide that he did), was his meaning determined and limited by his expectation of the imminent end of history, about which we were thinking in the preceding lecture?

The «flattening» problem that Bloom worried about was too nervous about a brutish end of history than an infinity of beastly novelties, but we've put so much effort into sanding off the sharp edges of our beastliness that it's no surprise collective naughtiness seems at the same time to be getting safer and more dangerous.

We should get 45M on him, we lost money on Diaby, just hoping we don't make the same mistake again, for waiting for his probably potential, get the money end of history

Back to Ian Wilson's End of History speech from the 1990s... (which I can not readily find online: thesis: problems with saving digital data will make the «information age» poorly documented.)

If one is thinking about the negative element only — that is, about the silence of Jesus concerning particular questions of political organization and strategy or of moral casuistry — his belief in the early end of history may well be urged as the explanation.

Ideal for either the beginning, middle or end of a history topic or unit.

These are nostalgia ploys, meant to take us back to the 1990s, when capitalism was triumphant and we talked about the end of history.

[2] The current framework is not necessarily the end of history.

At the end of history, «everything will be saved.

If there is an end, it is simply the end of history, the end of human definition to a reality ALREADY AS ALWAYS defined, already beating in perfect accord with its maker's design.

The existential experience of God is but a symbol of what actually will happen at the end of history on a cosmic level.

Jaded by experience and suspicious of narrative, we can not credit the secular prophecies of the past two centuries, which divined the end of history in a worker's state or the global triumph of democratic capitalism.

Fukuyama of Johns Hopkins University, best known for The End of History and the Last Man, brings his considerable talents to bear on the question of nation - building.

Protestants often act as if the Reformation were the end of history, the moment when the Church reached its final condition.

Despite the disaster and setbacks of human weakness, this tradition grows in depth and clarity, pointing with ever more urgent expectation to the coming of someone who will be the fullness of revelation and the end of history.

But from God's own perspective, the end of history is simply the point at which we encounter the reality that was true all along — that God is indeed eternally and self - consistently God but manifests Godself to history only as its forward flow is terminated.

He conceives of God as now in the process of becoming, who at the end of history, however, will finally become fully actual.

But the actuality of God in this sense, as unifying within himself all of history, necessarily marks the end of history as well.

As time went on and the concept developed, all kinds of pictures and ideas were associated with it, especially in the apocalyptic literature: the transformation of the earth, the end of history, the resurrection of the dead, and many others.

There was indeed a brief period in the time following the experience of the resurrection when the believers expected the return of the Lord and the end of history so that a certain indifference to normal responsibilities in an ongoing history appears.

This, he claims, is in accordance with the Scriptures, which declare that only at the end of history is the deity of God unquestionably open to all - an event.

Daniel M. Bell Jr., author of Liberation Theology after the End of History, teaches at Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary] in South Carolina.

He also absolutized the end of history thesis, making more strident than what one finds in Hegel.

For Houellebecq's real dread is that none of these things will ever happen — that contemporary Europe is indeed the end of history — that our hearts «hardened and smoked dry by dissipation» can nevermore convert.

So the idea of the End of History is present in some sense in every perception that people are right to be surrendering what distinguishes themselves as human beings these days.

A decade ago, Francis Fukuyama launched a very lively public discussion about «the end of history.»

The End of History, Marx's Heideggerian critics say, would have to be the end of humanity.

At the end of history, we can return to nature or eternity as either soulless animals or contemplative thinkers.