The 2014 letter declares that «Studies have suggested a correlation
between exclusionary discipline policies and practices and an array of serious educational, economic, and social problems, including school avoidance... decreased academic achievement... increased likelihood of dropping out; substance abuse; and involvement with juvenile justice systems.»
And, you know, speaking to education and justice, in 2011, the u.s. department — the departments of education and justice launched a supportive school discipline initiative to
reduce exclusionary discipline policies, practices and their impact on youth of color and youth with disabilities.
The GradMinnesota coalition — youth, communities, schools, government agencies, businesses and families — has developed seven priority recommendations and goals to increase graduation rates including: creating and aligning services to recover and re-engage youth;
replacing exclusionary discipline policies and practices with more effective alternatives; and increasing opportunities for mentoring throughout the state.
Studies have suggested a correlation
between exclusionary discipline policies and practices and an array of serious educational, economic, and social problems, including school avoidance and diminished educational engagement; 9 decreased academic achievement; 10 increased behavior problems; 11 increased likelihood of dropping out; 12 substance abuse; 13 and involvement with juvenile justice systems.14
For some time now, the failures of zero tolerance,
exclusionary discipline policies in all public schools have been clear.
Instead, children with behavioral health conditions are often marginalized through the use of
exclusionary discipline policies that disrupt their education.
Research shows that
exclusionary discipline policies, such as suspension and expulsion, do not reduce disruption, improve school climate, or increase student achievement.