I do not see how the existing climate model can be useful if they are based
on false science and math.
Create a false problem
with false science and use bureaucrats to bypass politicians to close industry down and make developed countries pay.
A fascinating exercise for any objective reporter to undertake would be to ask the student to cite actual physical evidence (full context document scans, undercover video / audio transcripts, leaked emails, money - transfer receipts, etc.) proving skeptic scientists were paid to fabricate
demonstratively false science papers, reports, assessments or viewpoints — material that could stand up in a courtroom evidentiary hearing proving a pay - for - performance arrangement exists.
This abysmal failure to show us all absolute evidence of illicit money exchanged for fabricated, demonstratively
false science papers / assessments is the proverbial «mathematical certainty «that dooms the accusation, and places the whole idea of man - caused global warming in peril of sinking if its promoters can not defend their position against science - based criticism from skeptic scientists.
Before this happens, there will be a «great falling away» from the faith
because false science (evolution) along with false doctrines (esp dualism) will fall, thus leaving the truth — Christ and His coming Kingdom which is «not of this world».
In the US, our national public radio network («NPR») interviewed SuperFreakenmonics authors this past week (mid-October), noting that the Union of Concerned Scientists (a US NGO specializing in
rebutting false science and the interests they represent) has proposed to debate the authors on the climate science fundamentals.
Real science from a false scientist is the inverse of the AGW pattern, in which certain real scientists
publish false science.
He, probably more than any other scientist, then used his position and political views to
perpetuate false science to the detriment of society.
Every step of the way... as skeptics took apart false databases, false analysis,
false science reporting, and even fluffy video productions by former vice presidents... the group simply moved on.
We don't need false religions and
false science to find happiness.
Neither do you and how is
it false science... Typical of an atheist to discredit scientists who believe that the earth was created by a superior deity... I can do the same with any evolutionists... The thing with mars as you said how do you know if it did support life?
I also question science, because while there is good science there is also a lot of
false science (only looking for evidence that supports a pre-determined answer).
To recap: atheists don't believe Satan exists either, so the «Satan wants us to doubt so he creates «
false science»» defense doesn't work.
Senator Larry Craig, Idaho, Northwest HydroPower Asso., kill funding «Fish Passage Center» due to
false science / data cloaked in advocacy...
For forty years the Daily Mail has been running its malevolent, systematic campaign of misinformation and
false science.
2006: Eugenie Scott, the Dover High School Department, and R. Wesley McCoy — The two individuals and the teachers, each independently and in their own way, fought the attempts to replace sound teaching of evolution with
the false science of creationism.
It is minor collateral damage compared to the energy policies built around
the false science, but damage to progress in understanding climate nonetheless.
They isolated anyone who challenged either part of
their false science in the same way Velikovsky was marginalized.
The Montreal Protocol was based on
the false science that a variation in atmospheric ozone was due to human - produced CFCs.
Those promoting
the false science are pushing even harder as they lose ground, but a final disclosure would expose the full extent of the deceptions.
Now children suffer from the understandable public reaction to the fears
the false science created.
It is built on
the false science created by the IPCC to support the political objective of Agenda 21.
Some may feel a sense of acknowledgement when
the false science confirms their skills.
Possibly because there may well be AGW happening but
false science is not the way to explore the cause and extent of this phenomenon.
Meanwhile, nature ignores
the false science.
Both were critical science issues promoting
the false science.
Portraying Dr Mann falsely as producing fraudulent science they are hoping to cast doubt in the minds of the public who can not tell the difference between one study from the thousands that make up the case for AGW and the false claims that
false science is harming the «American way of life» which apparently is non negotiable.
It's willful because of the clear evidence of
false science and failure of similar policies in any place that pursued green energy.
Gore continues to push
his false science with, among other things, orchestrated projects and a failure to correct the 35 errors identified in his movie.
The Province of Ontario is a classic example of the damage done by
the false science of global warming and latterly climate change.
Unfortunately, most are repeating
the false science of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) who incorrectly predicted severe weather increases because of warming.