Sentences with phrase «for negligent hiring»

Served as an expert witness in a disability discrimination lawsuit in which a national security company was sued for negligent hiring of an allegedly disabled employee who caused a motor vehicle accident.

If the trucking company fails to perform adequate background checks in the hiring process, it can be held liable for negligent hiring.

With lawsuits for negligent hiring on the rise, employers can still find themselves the target of negligent hiring by failing to supervise the hiring practices of their staffing vendors.

If a company fails to conduct such investigation or is careless in its investigation, it could be held responsible for the negligent hiring of a driver.

Twenty - two percent cited liability for negligent hiring.

Most states allow people to file cases against employers for negligent hiring, but the standards for such cases vary from state to state.

If the driver had a history of unsafe driving and violations, then the trucking company might even bear further responsibility for negligent hiring.

The fear of being sued for negligent hiring is a huge factor in the decision to perform employee background screening.

The employer could potentially be held liable for negligent hiring, which means any money spent on the background check was wasted.

[1] The industry really began booming after 9/11 in an effort to, among other things, ensure workplace safety and protect companies from lawsuits for negligent hiring.

Or they may want to reduce their legal liability for negligent hiring.

If employers hire employees they knew — or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known — were dangerous, unfit, or unqualified for the position, employers can be sued for negligent hiring if injuries or death occur.

The accident victim may also be able to sue the trucking company for negligent hiring, retention, or supervision of a negligent truck driver — especially in cases where the truck driver has a history of prior accidents, negligent driving, moving violations, or fines.

What a thorough social media and online background search includes and how it may help reduce your risk for negligent hiring

If the driver had a record of irresponsible driving, including previous accidents involving fatigue, the employer might also be responsible for negligent hiring or negligent entrustment.

August, 2007, Minnesota Association for Justice Annual Convention — Trucking Claims for Negligent Hiring, Retention, Training, Entrustment and Punitive Damages

As far as the claims against the pizza franchise, the plaintiff alleged negligence under the doctrine of respondeat superior (Latin for, «let the master answer») and also direct negligence for negligent hiring, negligent training, and negligent supervision.

CRST, Inc. v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Four [published] Plaintiff sued the employer of a truck driver for negligent hiring / retention and sought punitive damages.

Employers find that hiring an experienced and qualified background screening company, also known as a CRA, improves hiring decisions and helps keep them out of the courtroom for negligent hiring practices.

Employers have been getting hit big recently for negligent hiring, according to attorney Lester Rosen, founder and CEO Employment Screening Resources.

«An employer could be liable for negligent hiring in that they failed to take precautions before hiring a dangerous person,» Waterfill said.

Next, the court considered the allegations against the Brokerage for negligent hiring and supervision of the Salesperson.

Employers can be the subject of lawsuits for negligent hiring if they hire someone that they knew or should have known — through the exercise of due diligence — was dangerous, unfit, or unqualified for the position.

A hospital may also be held liable for negligent hiring of an anesthesiologist who was acting as an independent contractor.

'' [Screening] demonstrates due diligence in case a firm is ever sued for negligent hiring,» Rosen said.

If a member of the public sued an employer for negligent hiring, the employer theoretically could bring a third - party suit against the screening company, claiming that it hired the person because of an allegedly faulty resume verification, according to Paler.

An employer who hires a person with a criminal record can be found liable for negligent hiring if the hiring decision results in harm and could have been avoided by a simple criminal record check.

What a thorough social media and online background search includes and how it can reduce your risk for negligent hiring

In fact, many employers believe that they can bypass the threat of litigation for negligent hiring or tort liability by using workers who are screened elsewhere when, in reality, companies should assume that regardless of the party with ultimate responsibility for the acts of contingent workers, the company that worker is «representing» bears the most risk.

When an employer fails to ensure that the agency supplying its contingent workforce is diligently screening its workers, the liability for negligent hiring could transfer directly to the organization.

Trucking companies can be found liable for vicarious liability for the actions of their drivers, or for negligent hiring or supervision.

The first theory is direct negligence, namely that the HMO is liable for negligent hiring, supervision or retention of a doctor accused of malpractice.

If the driver has had a long string of DUIs and he was drunk when he failed to adequately secure the goods, but the employer hired him without performing a background check, the employer may also be directly liable for negligent hiring or negligent supervision.

The origin of the doctrine making an employer liable for negligent hiring, as well as negligent retention, arose out of the common law fellow - servant law which imposed a duty on employers to select employees who would not endanger fellow employees by their presence on the job.

If your organization is aware, or have reason to believe your employee is unfit for duty, your organization may be held liable for negligent hiring and subjected to wrongful death lawsuits.

One purpose of the insurance is to defray the costs of lawsuits for negligent hiring and retention.

Employers who are sued for negligent hiring have minimized their risks if they previously conducted a background check, said Kevin Klimas, president of Phoenix - based Clarifacts Inc., an employment screening firm.

√ Inexperienced / incompetent entry level people performing inadequate background checks relying on extremely cheap databases searches can not easily be defended if you get sued for negligent hiring.

«RiteAid Settles for $ 2.4 Million for Negligent Hiring», «Negligent Hiring Case Settles for $ 5.4 Million», «Chem - Dry Carpet Cleaner Arrested for Murder»... These are the headlines all businesses want to avoid.

An employer that hires someone it either knew or should have known was dangerous, unfit, or unqualified for the work can be sued for negligent hiring.

«Employers can be the subject of lawsuits for negligent hiring if they hire someone that they should have known, through the exercise of due diligence and background screening, was dangerous, unfit, dishonest or unqualified.»

«Employers can be sued for negligent hiring if they hire someone they should have known, through the exercise of due diligence, was dangerous, unfit, dishonest, or unqualified.»

Just one bad hire can create a significant and financial nightmare, including lawsuits for negligent hiring, theft, workplace violence, and having unqualified workers on the job.

Rosen also told SHRM that background screening «demonstrates due diligence in case a firm is ever sued for negligent hiring» and that even «verification of the past employment, dates and title, at least verifies the application, so the employer knows the past employment is accurate and real.»