Among those 50 and older, 55 % say alternative energy development is more important, while 34 % say it's more important to expand production
of fossil fuel energy sources.
The largest majority of real cuts in
fossil fuel energy use need to come from the world's richest people and largest corporations to solve the problem faster.
This amount of consumption, especially from
fossil fuel energy sources, will continue to harm the environment until we come together and find better ways to create energy.
The net effect is a strong incentive for consumers, business people, and entrepreneurs to find ways to replace
fossil fuel energy with clean energy and energy efficiency.
According to the pay as you go rules of the congress, this was to be paid for by increased taxes
on fossil fuel energy industries such as oil, natural gas and coal.
(PS there are also emissions and energy consumption associated with
fossil fuel energy supply outside the combustion of fuel, since power plants have to be built and run, etc.).
It's more likely that nothing will be done to rapidly and permanently
reduce fossil fuel energy use and carbon pollution in the next 20 years.
What would motivate the world's richest corporations to make a policy change to
cut fossil fuel energy use in their company to under 10 % by 2050 or else?
The increasing ecological and environmental impact of a given amount of
useful fossil fuel energy is a relevant consideration in assessing alternative energy strategies.
That's because the military has to operate in the real world,
where fossil fuel energy supplies (other than coal) are becoming scarce.
This would slow, but not stop our transition to wind and solar power — because their cost is at last low enough to out -
compete fossil fuel energy in many states.
By
applying fossil fuel energy, new machines, and new forms of organization to production, far more goods could be produced by a given work force.
In contrast to their lack of discussion of climate change, both candidates talk extensively about their plans to develop
domestic fossil fuel energy.
We have more
fossil fuel energy reserves in the ground than we can store in the atmosphere if we want to avoid dangerous climate change.
If people want and
need fossil fuel energy, if they're willing to pay for it, then someone will find a way to get the fossil fuels out of the ground.
Global tourism is largely dependent
on fossil fuel energy, and emits more CO2 than than all but five countries of the world.
For other environmentalists, opposition to the pipeline is an imperative to act on climate change by moving away
from fossil fuel energy and towards clean, renewable energy.
Ultimately, such work will help reduce the impacts that nuclear and
fossil fuel energy use have on the environment.
The increasing ecological and environmental impact of a given amount of
useful fossil fuel energy is a relevant consideration in assessing alternative energy strategies.
The inertia of energy system infrastructure, i.e., the time required to replace
fossil fuel energy systems, will make it exceedingly difficult to avoid a level of atmospheric CO2 that would eventually have highly undesirable consequences.
The inertia of energy system infrastructure, i.e., the time required to
replace fossil fuel energy systems, will make it exceedingly difficult to avoid a level of atmospheric CO2 that would eventually have highly undesirable consequences.
Turns out there were a few devilish items in the details — including a provision which would allow tax break funds to be used to construct a new
fossil fuel energy plant in Centralia, WA.
Japan is experiencing some serious economic trouble at the moment largely because they are importing so
much fossil fuel energy thanks to having their nuclear off line.
There is an overlying awareness when assessing New York's environmentally progressive work - in - progress that the effects climate change and
fossil fuel energy industries have on the environment, infrastructure and public health don't stop at state lines.
The current
fossil fuel energy pricing reality along with new exploration and production technology is providing an economic basis for an immediate, practical transition and conversion to greener energy supplies of wind, solar, geothermal and hydropower.
Green Party candidate Matt Funiciello said the U.S. needs to take immediate action to get off of
dirty fossil fuel energy sources like natural gas and coal and switch to 100 percent renewable energy sources like solar and wind.
Former Vice President Al Gore spoke at the March 29 press conference and addressed the need to prosecute
fossil fuel energy companies for engaging in fraud.
Phrases with «fossil fuel energy»