Sentences with phrase «from tar sands»

Developing and burning oil from the tar sands produces up to ten times as many greenhouse gases as conventional oil.

On a lifetime basis, a gallon of gasoline made from tar sands produces about 15 % more carbon dioxide emissions than one made from conventional oil.

Energy producers can calculate, almost down to the barrel, how much oil can be extracted from a tar sands plot.

And companies that take action to reduce oil use and avoid fuel from tar sands will distinguish themselves in ways that will be well rewarded by consumers and appreciated by future generations.

You would only have surface rights but just wait a few years and oil pollution from the tar sands will be enough to make it economical to recycle a few barrels at a time.

Burning a gallon of gas from tar sands releases as much as 37 percent more carbon pollution than burning a gallon of gas from conventional oil.

The review used this assumption to get out of any meaningful consideration of the climate pollution from tar sands expansion, and in this time of worsening climate change that is not acceptable.

Scientists say that even though the cooling effect from aerosols is real, the biggest climate challenge from the tar sands is their carbon dioxide emissions.

Four tons of sand and soil are removed and dumped for every one barrel of oil gained from tar sands.

Some of them have died from tar sands, but nobody seems able to mention that.

Environmental advocates have long called for an outright rejection of the proposed pipeline expansion, citing past pipeline spills and the high levels of pollution that result from tar sands extraction.

More specifically, this means that no more than 7.5 billion barrels of oil can be extracted from the tar sands by 2050.

The process is so carbon intensive that to create oil from the tar sands emits at least five times more carbon dioxide then does the effort of processing «sweet crude» oil.

First, producing oil from tar sands emits two to three times the global warming pollution of conventional oil.

Tar sands crude is significantly more carbon intensive than conventional crude, and just the additional emissions from the tar sands in Keystone XL - above average emissions from producing non-tar sands oil - are equal to Americans driving more than 60 billion additional miles every year.

That new report mentioned is one that TreeHugger highlighted a few weeks ago which showed that the increasing emissions from tar sands production in Canada would more than cancel out greenhouse gas emission reductions made elsewhere in the nation, and would make it impossible to reach the county's Copenhagen Accord commitment.

Later this year, President Obama will decide whether to grant a permit for a pipeline running from the tar sands of Alberta.

As the refining of bitumen from tar sands mines creates particularly dirty fuel, Valero and the other oil companies crawling around northern Alberta aren't happy to see California's Global Warming Solutions Act survive Proposition 23.

(It came on the heels of a Bush administration decision to permit an earlier pipeline from those tar sands deposits through North Dakota to Oklahoma).

Overwhelmingly, experts agree that oil mined from tar sands in Alberta, Canada is far worse for the climate than most of the oil currently produced and sold in the United States, because of the added pollution from extracting, refining, and delivering it.

The pipeline carries heavy crude from the tar sands of Canada to refineries near the Texas Gulf coast.

The Keystone XL pipeline would have transported the dirtiest and most expensive type of petroleum from tar sands in Alberta, Canada, to US refineries in the Gulf of Mexico.

The Alberta tar sands is taking another hit as two major retailers — Whole Foods and Bed Bath & Beyond — announced on Wednesday that they are moving to avoid using the petroleum products sourced from the tar sands for transporting product, according to a ForestEthics press release.

Even by 2050, the report says, CCS technology will be insufficient for fuel derived from tar sands to qualify under emerging low - carbon fuel standards, such as those in California and the European Union.

This rapid increase in GHGs is because there is not one single federal regulation to limit the amount of GHGs from tar sands development, permitting tar sands companies to continue to expand production — and greenhouse gas emissions — in perpetuity.

industry requires investment — our gov» t isn't directing any of the «billions» it makes from the tar sands into green energy tech or even saving a penny of it for any useful reason.

In a related announcement describing new regulations that the Conservative federal government said it will impose on the fossil fuel industries, there was no mention of any attempt to rein in emissions from the tar sands projects in Alberta.

That last one's particularly important, as the Obama administration is still considering the approval of the Keystone XL Pipeline, which will run from the tar sands of Alberta, Canada, to the Texas Gulf Coast.

All I counted, in short, was the CO2 that will be directly released by burning the oil plus the emissions required to extract and process the oil from the tar sands deposits.

As I wrote in Our Choice two years ago, gasoline made from the tar sands gives a Toyota Prius the same impact on climate as a Hummer using gasoline made from oil.

«The oil pulled from the tar sands gives a Toyota Prius the carbon footprint of a Hummer,» Gore said at the time, after blasting the Canadian government for its soft position on the exploitation of the tar sands.

The risks of spills from tar sands pipelines are high and U.S. safety regulations are not enough to protect special places such as the Great Lakes, the Nebraska Sandhills and the Ogallala Aquifer.

We've covered the environmental damage caused by extraction of oil from the tar sands on so many occasions that I'll just refer you to TreeHugger archives at the previous link if you need to get up to speed.

Most of the new crude will come from the tar sands of northern Alberta, which are lousy with oil - rich bitumen.

Kinder Morgan is an oil pipeline, meaning it serves customers who want to transport their products from the tar sands to international markets.

We have two main concerns: the risk of oil spills along the pipeline, which would traverse highly sensitive terrain, and the fact that the extraction of petroleum from the tar sands creates far more greenhouse emissions than conventional production does.

Producing synthetic crude oil from tar sands generates three times the global warming pollution of conventional crude production.

Here are a few takeaways from the tar sands industry's most recent setback.

The Canadians have also had success in obtaining liquid fuels from the tar sands which accompany the shales.

For every barrel of extra oil obtained from tar sands as a result of the pipeline, global oil consumption would increase by 0.6 barrels, because the extra oil would lower oil prices and encourage people to use more.

Klein follows the «dark» money behind the propaganda of climate - change denial, the effort to dismantle the federal government to curtail corporate regulation, and the justification for the feverish pursuit of the riskiest forms of carbon - emission - producing energy from tar sands extraction to deep - water drilling, fracking, and mountaintop - removal coal mining.

Whoa, geeking out there... This is how Maude Barlow described what she saw in real life: Steam Rises From the Ground, No Birds Dare Fly Above Upon returning from the tar sands tour, Barlow said she saw stream rising from the ground, with no birds in the sky or animals below, adding that she wasn't being cute in describing the project in Tolkein-esque terms.