Sentences with phrase «human caused warming»

And how exactly can you separate natural warming from human caused warming?

Or did humans cause the warming, and natural variability cause the cooling?

Subsequent reporting of The Decision, mentioned that we don't know whether Trump believes in human caused warming.

Major evidence humans caused warming were made in the 2001 IPCC by Phil Jones, one of Lamb's successors as Director of the CRU.

He did not blink when he said most climate scientists do not believe humans cause warming or that global climate models are «hopelessly wrong» or that sea level rise is «natural and normal» or rising carbon dioxide levels are a result of warming, not a cause.

They may prove to be at least as important as the mathematical models, from which adherents of human caused warming tend to extract the worst case scenarios.

This warming is offset by anthropogenic aerosols, reducing the total human caused warming to 1.6 Wm - 2.

I know that there is a debate about [humans causing the warming of the planet]- that's all I am prepared to say.

If humans cause warming in the 21st century through additional emissions (and that is the expectation), then further global mean sea level rise is also expected.

«Believing» in human caused warming is unnecessary, since we have the scientific evidence.

There is no statistically significant acceleration in sea level rise that can be attributed to human caused warming

Seeing a poor polar bear floating on an iceberg does not mean that humans caused warming.

By the way, «Natural warming can't one on one be compared to human caused warming» as there is simply no way to measure / record / tell the difference.

Natural warming can't one on one be compared to human caused warming, they are simply different.

I've been a bit impressed in recent years (not) at the ability of politically endorsed science to be able to use data from these areas and regurgitate it as global data rather than regional data, or to relate it to human caused warming.