Sentences with phrase «in climate science»

Where do you come down on the whole subject of uncertainty in the climate science?

Unfortunately, this weakness applies more generally to how statistical methodology is used in the climate science community as well.

The arguments were ignored for lack of expertise in climate science.

That means requiring full transparency of data and methods used in climate science research, and third party review of the data, analysis, and models.

We aren't experts in climate science but we are experts in forecasting and verification.

The «Handbook» addresses a problem of little confidence in the climate science community.

Why would a scientist in an organization directly involved in climate science not feel free to speak out?

The challenge goes to a key problem in climate science today.

It is unlikely, however, that simply enhancing such source factors will be sufficient to establish trust in climate science communication.

Most changes in the landscape and developments in climate science are by nature incremental.

This has become one the biggest mysteries and most controversial issues in climate science today, throwing doubt over the assumed climate sensitivity to CO2.

The most interesting advances in climate science concern areas where there is no consensus but the consequences for humanity are grave, such as the possibility of extreme catastrophic impacts.

For my research in climate science, I use a satellite to measure physical and optical properties of clouds with the view to further improve weather and climate models.

This is a familiar pattern in health reporting (is coffee good for you / bad for you etc.), but in more recent times has started happening in climate science too.

Peer review in climate science means that the «team» recommends publication of each other's work, and tries to keep any off - message paper from being accepted for publication.

Many in the climate sciences fail to grasp what is really happening in feedback systems.

Something genuinely thoughtful from some seriously intelligent individuals that don't seem to have an axe to grind in the climate science debate.

This is a weakness in our science, not just in climate science.

The only agreement in climate science today seems to be «we need more money».

The 1950's — 1970's marks a 20 year period of great controversy in climate science where at times, one author or two, changed the perception of weather and climate.

I can't see that anyone in the climate science world has had that happen to them.

There is a strong degree of agreement in climate sciences on the question regarding anthropogenic climate change.

A popular method — much used in the climate science literature — is by a moving average.

The program takes great leaders and makes them exceptional, providing training in climate science, communications, and organizing to better tell the story of climate change and inspire communities everywhere to act.

And don't publish because it is not standard in «climate science», but who defines standards in climate science?

Is there somewhere I can get a reasonable understanding about this without doing a 3 - year course in climate science?

The mechanisms of internal variability is one of the more interesting topics in climate science.

They are more inclined — both on the left and the right — to believe in climate science and to support renewable energy.

There is no point discussing this because here we have one of the few cases in climate science where we have actual measurements to prove something.

Lack of transparency in climate science has been cited by independent inquiries.

The science in climate science must be different to the one I practice.