While they talk of «inner peace» and «humility» they always seek to push their
way into the public discourse and very often into your personal lives.
Because the topics of reparations and racism are connected, ethical and religious perspectives could be brought
into the public discourse on how prejudice functions, and how racism and injustice reflect different levels of complicity.
By locating the roots of environmental politics and public policy in the construction of knowledge about nature, Mark Dion questions the objectivity and authoritative role of the scientific voice in contemporary society, tracking how pseudo-science, social agendas and ideology
creep into public discourse and knowledge production.
«Until we get better information
into the public discourse about how these platforms are shaping the information environments that they control, we are sort of talking about policy options in the dark.»
Whether it is to
bring into the public discourse matters of social justice or the borders of the polity, one always wants to erect some kind of a house in the public space.
In a time where deliberately false information is continually
introduced into public discourse, and quickly spread through social media shares and likes, it is more important than ever for young people to develop their critical thinking.
There may be times when it will be better for everyone involved to just say two words («I'm sorry») and move on, letting the words become your only
entry into the public discourse.
It was one more voice attempting to inject religiously informed
wisdom into a public discourse that is increasingly debased by major media that are as morally ignorant as they are religiously indifferent.
Participants in this practice, known as scriptural reasoning, are part of a movement that wants to protect religiously plural societies while simultaneously encouraging religious people to enter more
deeply into public discourse.
Instead it has deepened, spreading a peculiar kind of
confusion into our public discourse, political institutions, popular culture, the lives of religious believers, and entire communities of faith — including, at times, the Church herself.
John Maynard Keynes likewise dismissed them as «mad scribblers,» but American scholars of political science and international relations — more so than their counterparts in other countries — are in a comparatively advantageous position to have their ideas
fed into the public discourse.
For example, Van Blerkom and Albertini have a gentlemanly disagreement about recent research that may spill out
into the public discourse soon because it raises the possibility that some popular IVF techniques might have subtle but long - term health implications for children conceived in a dish.
Today, there are substantial professional rewards for scholars who do hyper - sophisticated, narrowly conceived research, but little institutional recognition, acknowledgment, or support for scholars who carry their
efforts into the public discourse.
The breathtaking implication of Macedo's views on «public reason» is that children should be taught that it is wrong to inject religious
convictions into public discourse.
Dr. Gleb Tsipursky has written a timely and essential book for all who are fed up with the current post - truth times we live in and are looking for ways to put real, verifiable truth
back into public discourse.
In terms of style, his general idea is to bring writing about
art into public discourse and away from the near - incomprehensible academy (represented by most of the pedantic grad student analyses in Artforum, or anything in Texte zur Kunst, for example).
The third one which I am raising is that Gleick deliberately decided to take the heat in order to force the issue of cynical think
tanks into public discourse.
It is a film folks and it has a purpose, to bring the issue of climate
change into public discourse and provide information about climate change to those without much previous information, or whose information has come from media owned by Rupert Murdoch.
However, only recently have these differences in rates of children's services interventions begun to be thought of as an issue of childhood inequality, forty years on from the emergence of health
inequalities into public discourse.
In recent months, as the 2016 election campaigns have gathered momentum, concern about the long - term effects of the buyback craze has
crept into public discourse and caught the attention of politicians.
Arguments made — and
entered into the public discourse — about the effects of AGW and our response to them should be seen as affecting all of us, not just as an argument by special interest or about «thing».
The fault for this lies with those editors and television producers acting as compromised gatekeepers of what information makes
it into the public discourse.