Sentences with phrase «law in question»

Who cares if the case law in question was fifteen years ago?

On this basis, the criminal laws in question were found to engage security of the person concerns.

The Georgia law in question created the independent charter commission, with its seven members appointed by the state board of education based on recommendations from the governor and legislative leaders.

In addition, the Explanatory Memorandum accompanying each instrument should explain what the EU law in question currently does, the effect of any amendment and why such amendment is necessary.

I've done some cursory searching for an English source for the specific law in question but have yet to discover one, please feel free to add a link in the comments if you find one.

In addition to raising insurance issues, giving advice with respect to foreign law in a jurisdiction where you are not admitted could expose you to an unauthorized practice of law prosecution, even assuming you have sufficient knowledge of the foreign law in question.

The data they discuss come from studies that were not part of the record below, or specific to the Indiana law in question...

Intrigued by the punishment of what seems to me to be normal public discourse, I went looking for the German law in question.

I do think the idea of allowing something close to judicial notice in place of expert evidence could only have one of two effects: 1) The judge would have decide on a case - by - case basis whether he or she is qualified to advise himself / herself as to «law» generally, or 2) The judge would have to undertake a self - qualification analysis to determine whether he or she is sufficiently expert in the area of law in question to forego actual expert evidence.

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is the new EU law in question.

Apparently, the law in question listed several vehicles that could not be parked for more than twenty four hours, including a «motor vehicle camper».

When the court does so, it declares the law in question to be unenforceable and void.

The law in question is vague enough that opponents claim opposite citing same code, but it's down to interpretation, and legal opinion was that it was proper and legal.

Should such a repository include a feature to enable members of the public to comment and raise issues online, (i.e. publicly, in a somewhat standardized format, cross referenced to the laws in question), similar to a bug tracking system?

This instruction to keep quiet was reported to be given at a meeting held at the capitol, where sheriffs thought they were going to be discussing changes that could be made to the law in question.

As regards the aim of «public safety», the Court noted that the legislature had sought, by passing the Law in question, to satisfy the need to identify individuals in order to prevent danger for the safety of persons and property and to combat identity fraud.

The law in question takes away nearly all collective bargaining rights from public workers and also forces state employees to contribute more toward their pension and health care benefits, amounting to an 8 percent pay cut.

This is one of the cases that the framers of the 22nd Amendment to the US constitution (the law in question) had already considered:

* You can include information about political implications, but please only do so as a means of identifying the laws in question.

Prosser and Gov. Scott Walker, who proposed the law in question, both served in the state Assembly at the same time in the 1990s.

«Issue is not about other non-doms» Justice Secretary Jack Straw told Jon Snow that the law on non-dom donations to political parties had been changed — the law in question would come into force next year.

The law in question, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, has been used by the Justice Department to prosecute a woman who used a fake MySpace account to verbally attack a 13 - year old girl who then committed suicide.

According to the Court, the laws in question — laws that govern teacher tenure, dismissal, and layoffs — impose substantial harm on California's students by forcing administrators to push passionate, inspiring teachers out of the school system and keep grossly ineffective teachers in front of students year after year.

He also said there is evidence that the laws in question disproportionately affect poor and minority students.

Judge Treu also concluded that the laws in questions disproportionately affect low - income and minority students and that a «lack of effective dismissal statutes and LIFO» harm them through the so - called «dance of the lemons,» a tactic often used by districts to send the least effective teachers into classrooms with the high concentrations of vulnerable students.

Commissioner Pryor, Bridgeport Mayor Bill Finch, Paul Vallas and others have even gone so far as to call the law in question a technicality.

Thus, Judge Treu struck down the laws in question.

The law in question is the Every Student Succeeds Act, the successor to President George W. Bush's No Child Left Behind program.

The unions argue that the laws in question simply guarantee teachers due process.

With much fanfare and press releases, the law in question was signed on July 13, 2011 by Governor Dannel Malloy.

For this argument to succeed, Mr. Grenon was required to show, as articulated by the Supreme Court in Withler v Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 12 (CanLII), first, that the law in question created a distinction based on a ground enumerated in section 15 (i.e. sex), or a ground analogous thereto (i.e. family status).

In the physical realm you can at least touch and come to appreciate the many parts at play when checking to see that the law in question is «good law.»

Allowing unconstitutional laws to remain on the books deprives Parliament of certainty as to the constitutionality of the law in question and thus of the opportunity to remedy it.

The law in question was enacted more than two decades ago, in the wake of the Bhopal chemical plant disaster.

In this specific situation, the law in question is criminal law, so the term you are looking for is the principle of personality.

Under the reasonableness standard the reviewing court defers to the statutory decision - maker and limits its review to an inquiry as to whether the impugned decision is intelligible, transparent, and justified, as well as within the range of possible outcomes given the applicable facts and law in question (Dunsmuir at para 47).

This is subject to any statutory provision (explained by Lord Justice Ward in Wicks v Wicks [1998] 1 FLR 470, [1998] 3 WLR 277, CA, [1998] 1 All ER 977) covering the field of law in question.

I don't have a solid answer for you, because I'm really not familiar with the laws in question, but you should look at Fair Use Doctrine, and see how sites like DNDBeyond (which provide similar functions, albeit computerized, so they calculate stuff for you too) operate.

To say it is surely illegal without any direct reference to the law in question isn't really helpful.

Now, it seems to me impossible to show that the law in question contemplates either the trial of a person for an offence committed before its passage or the punishment of any person for such an offence.

Since you posted this answer, there have been changes to the law in question.

And where the law in question is a criminal statute, the courts have repeatedly affirmed that it should be given a narrow rather than liberal interpretation.