Arndell v Robison 589 Fed Appx 844 (9th Cir 2015)(affirming dismissal of
legal malpractice claim against clients because claims barred by statute of limitations)
A Bankruptcy Court Order Permitting Creditors to Pursue
Legal Malpractice Claims in State Court in the Name of a Debtor's was an Impermissible Assignment and Violates Public Policy Co-authored with Joseph Garin, published in the March 2017 issue of the eAdvisory published by the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Lawyers» Professional Liability
A Bankruptcy Court Order Permitting Creditors to
Pursue Legal Malpractice Claims in State Court in the Name of a Debtor's was an Impermissible Assignment and Violates Public Policy Co-authored with Jessica Green, published in the March 2017 issue of the eAdvisory published by the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Lawyers» Professional Liability
Ames & Gough, a specialty insurance broker, has issued the results of its 2017 survey
on legal malpractice claims with nine leading lawyers» professional insurers.
Those who
defend legal malpractice claims are very familiar with the malpractice lawsuit in which the attorney who gave casual legal advice at the church picnic or over the backyard fence is sued for that advice.
Jack engineered a successful summary judgment in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida for a large Washington, DC communications law firm in a $ 100 million
federal legal malpractice claim involving Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations.
In a case of first impression, the New York Court of Appeals in Grace v. Law recently held that the failure of a plaintiff to appeal an underlying adverse ruling does not bar a
subsequent legal malpractice claim, unless the attorney - defendant can prove that plaintiff would have been «likely to succeed» in his appeal.
She has co-authored an article on the topic of the statute of limitations and
legal malpractice claims featured in the Michigan Defense Quarterly as well as being invited to speak to the Oakland University (MI)- William Beaumont Hospital Graduate School of Nurse Anesthetists on the topic of Medical Malpractice.
[Legal malpractice claim failed where lawyers gave competent opinion on defensibility of underlying claims, and where plaintiff failed to demonstrate loss caused by attorney's malpractice.]
Legal malpractice claims do not generally lead to recovery of emotional distress damages, but the Iowa Supreme Court is making headlines for reminding us there is always an exception to every rule.
Elefant begins, «Apparently, for well - connected law firms in Connecticut, there's a far more potent tool than pedestrian legal malpractice insurance for
addressing legal malpractice claims: personal legislation...»
According to this National Law Journal article, the ABA's 2008 study on lawsuits reveals that
legal malpractice claims tied to real estate transactions increased by four percentage points between 2003 and 2007.
practicePRO, LAWPRO's risk management and claims prevention initiative, provides lawyers with tools and resources to help them succeed in the practice of law and avoid a malpractice claim (see this article for information on the most
common legal malpractice claims).
In the real world, trying to «fake it to make it» in an unfamiliar area of law is unfair to the client, dangerous to the lawyer's reputation, and risks a
potential legal malpractice claim.
Ambrose v Fried Michigan Court of Appeal Docket No 249482 (November 30, 2004)(affirming lower court decision to grant summary disposition to client because statute of limitations
barred legal malpractice claim)
I believe my clients should be defended zealously, particularly
since legal malpractice claims strike at the very heart of a lawyer's biggest asset: his or her reputation.
Mr. Hemmat brought a successful
legal malpractice claim against two prominent Denver law firms for their mistreatment and negligence in handling a brain injured client's insurance claim.
While Ontario lawyers will appreciate that LAWPRO defends them
on legal malpractice claims, they may not appreciate the breadth of legal issues that come up in those claims.
Injury
from legal malpractice claims must be filed (1) within four years of the incident or (2) within one year of the discovery of the malpractice.
Corporate / commercial law accounts for the third highest number
of legal malpractice claims in Ontario, after real estate and civil litigation.
Supreme Court resolved a split of authority among published Court of Appeal opinions and held that the statute of limitations
for legal malpractice claims (Cal.
Additionally, the SJC rejected Otis» arguments that judicial estoppel should not be applied because: (1) Otis is bringing the present suit as an assignee of Cusick and is therefore presenting Cusick's claims, not his own; (2) Otis himself did not make inconsistent statement under oath concerning his comparative negligence; and (3) the SJC previously rejected use of judicial estoppel in cases of assignment of
legal malpractice claims.