How did they know that otherwise self - represented litigants would pay for the services of a limited
license legal technician when they were not willing to pay for the services of an attorney?
I conducted two of the interviews, one (together with the LTN's Laurence Colletti) of Clio founder and CEO Jack Newton in which he discusses his concept of effortless services, which I described in more detail in my post-mortem post about the conference, and the other about Washington state's limited license
legal technician program with Patrick Palace, former president of the Washington State Bar Association.
In this episode, we talk with Laura Genoves and her experiences as one of the first Limited Licensed
Legal Technicians in Washington State.
In addition, since this is a fairly new program, none of those currently licensed want to jeopardize the future
of legal technicians in our state.»
[11] That task force recommended the bar «consider the general concept of a limited license
for legal technicians as one component of the BOG's overall strategy for increasing access to justice.»
With the growing movement toward do - it - yourself legal services and relaxed regulations on providers, more clients are turning to online, non-attorney legal services and
legal technicians who are more adequately addressing the needs of the masses.
[30] The Committee particularly endorsed Washington's mandatory disclosures required
by legal technicians to their clients.
If this interests you, check out my report in the latest issue of the ABA Journal that explores this phenomenon in depth: Washington state moves around UPL,
using legal technicians to help close the justice gap.
[13] The report references a 1992 report to the Board of Governors, called the «
Legal Technician Task Force Report.»
Her practice, called
BGE Legal Technicians, operates out of a small office at 602 N. Argonne Road, in Spokane Valley.
Sam Glover:
Because legal technicians were brought about in part because of the movement to try and work on access to justice, do you feel like you have a sense for is that working?
Washington Limited License
Legal Technician Laura Genoves received this comment on her practice management blog post:
I have worked as a family law paralegal since 2010, then enrolled at UW School of Law to complete the family
law legal technician program, which I completed in 2016.
Washington's new Limited License
Legal Technician endeavor attempts to change the legal field by offering specialized training which will lead to more accessible legal services.
All the LLLTs that I interviewed, including Priscilla Selden of Columbia
Valley Legal Technician Services, commented that they are very careful to stay within their scope of service, referring work to attorneys when necessary.
Also, The Florida Bar was challenged by the larger community to expand access and by the movement
toward legal technicians and pro se litigation.
And, here in the States, Washington state recently passed a rule to
allow legal technicians to handle certain aspects of civil cases.
Two such programs are the Illinois JusticeCorps and the Limited License
Legal Technician position created by the Supreme Court of Washington.
We could end up with legal services, commoditised to absurdity, being provided by low
level legal technicians — possibly through online forms or call centres and commercial pressures being brought to bear to settle cases — more often than not to the advantage of the rich or corporate and, of course, the Legal Commoditiser representing the «client».
Licensed
Legal Technicians bring a similar option to the legal world, making legal services more accessible to people who can't afford an attorney.
The new system for limited license
legal technicians developed by Washington State and now being considered by others is an example and a positive contribution.
How can a J.D. program that does not include any instruction on running a business; using technology; required clinical or practical experience; nor articling or working under an experienced attorney somehow better prepares a JD to serve than an
educated legal technician?
Legal technicians consult with and advise clients, complete and file necessary court documents, help with court scheduling, and support clients in navigating the legal system.
Worth reading: I've been following Washington state's limited license
legal technician program since writing about it for the ABA Journal in 2015.
The Access and Affordability Committee of the State Bar's 21st Century Practice Task Force is tackling the new opportunities and challenges lawyers and potential clients face today in four specific areas: triage, referral and access to online information; access to quality legal counsel; use
of legal technicians and supportive services; and business process analysis and simplification.
The Limited License
Legal Technician Board has ongoing authority to adopt policies for the administration of the LLLT license and to recommend and develop practice areas under authority granted by the Washington Supreme Court under Rule 28 of the Admission and Practice Rules (APR).
In it, the Task Force recommended to the OSB's board of governors «that is consider the general concept of a limited license
for legal technicians as one component of the BOG's overall strategy for increasing access to justice.»
As a family law attorney from Washington State, I disagree with your characterizatiions of lawyers as Nietzsche affictionado Harvard types who should be replaced
by legal technicians.
Phrases with «legal technicians»