Sentences with word «lindzen»

# 92 Spencer el al 2007 paper doesn't really support the precise mechanism proposed by Lindzen for Iris effect, but more simply observes a strong TOA negative correction associated with warming events at 20 ° S - 20 ° N (that is: in the 2000 - 2005 period of observation, the most significative warming episodes of the surface + low troposphere — 40 days or more — leads to a negative SW+LW cloud forcing at the top of the atmosphere).

As Richard Lindzen said about global warming and CO2, the consensus was reached before the research had begun.

Hou and co-authors Ming - Dah Chou of Goddard's Climate and Radiation Branch and Richard S. Lindzen of MIT analyzed satellite observations over the vast ocean region, which stretches from Australia and Japan nearly to the Hawaiian Islands.

Within a few years, a number of analyses made clear that the evidence provided by Lindzen et al. had problems [e.g., Hartmann and Michelsen, 2002; Lin et al., 2002; Lin et al., 2004; Su et al., 2008].

But most scientists, including some who work with Dr. Lindzen at M.I.T., say the balance of data has shifted firmly toward a conclusion that people, through their impact on the atmosphere, are influencing climate now and will have even more impact in coming years.

I get the abiding impression that AGW advocates don't really read what Lindzen writes, they get their info 3rd hand.

Dr. Richard Lindzen writes, «Lewis does not take account of natural variability, and, I suspect, his estimates are high.»

Do you think Lindzen doesn't know this, or is he lying to us?

Considering the entire «$ 2500 per day» accusation originates from Gelbspan and nobody independently corroborates it, who could blame Dr Lindzen for seeing if he could sue him?

I think 1 deg C was the figure Richard Lindzen gave in testimony to the UK's House of Lords a few years ago.

For a complete analysis of the consensus which Lindzen says doesn't exist please go here: Does he have any conflict of interests?

What Lindzen also noted in this paper was another thing that remains true today: the remarkable proclivity of all manner of diverse groups to leap on the climate bandwagon.

There has also been a lot of talk about the dire scholarship from deniers, including Lindzen who is on the Academic Advisory Council of the GWPF.

[Response: Surely Lindzen knows that the dynamics involved are considerably more complicated than is suggested by the simplistic argument he puts forth.

The question is, does the public understand when someone like Lindzen claims that climate sensitivity is 1C or less?

That you believe Lindzen disagrees shows that you are hopelessly biased.

«Where [Lindzen] disagrees is the issue of urgency,» she says.

While Lindzen did accept the expenses, this doesn't mean he's on anybody's payroll.

Further, since Lindzen et al. used the full 17 months of data they had from the GSM archive, we have the potential for seasonality in the data.