Sentences with phrase «lower pixel density»

It's got a slightly lower pixel density, but the curved screen means it has a similarly - sized overall footprint.

Some users did not like the low 1080p resolution, which results in low pixel density due to the large screen.

But the poor camera quality and low pixel density screen is a drawback.

There are some cheap smartphones with 5 - inch displays but they have a very low pixel density and poor viewing angles.

Which means it looks about the same as the 5.2 - inch model just with a slightly lower pixel density.

Both the Galaxy Tab A 8.0 and the Galaxy Tab A 9.7 feature TFT touchscreens with the identical resolution of 1024 x 768, resulting in unfortunately low pixel densities of 160 ppi and 132 ppi respectively.

The 5.7 - inch display sports a 1,440 x 720 resolution and the HD + IPS LCD has a relatively low pixel density of around 282 ppi.

However, you're getting lower pixel density.

Both the Galaxy Tab A 8.0 and the Galaxy Tab A 9.7 feature TFT touchscreens with the identical resolution of 1024 x 768, resulting in unfortunately low pixel densities of 160 ppi and 132 ppi respectively.

The LG Bello on the other hand features a larger 5 - inch 854x480 pixel display, that makes for an even lower pixel density of 196ppi.

We'll begin with the iPad because it's the standard that all other Tablets are compared to... The iPad 2 has an excellent display, virtually identical in performance to the impressive iPhone 4 Retina Display, with a somewhat higher pixel resolution but a much lower pixel density of 132 ppi due to its much larger screen size.

The Tab 4 Nook's low pixel density makes for blurry fonts at smaller sizes, which kills the reading experience.

Now if they would only lower the pixel density and finally release a damn 30» monitor at that resolution!

The Galaxy S8 +, however, pales in front of the Pixel XL with a slightly lower pixel density of 529ppi.

All of this poster's points are true: the phone does have a great, bright screen despite its relatively low pixel density — something that I don't notice at all during day - to - day use.

The LG L Prime on the other hand is a larger device, although the resolution is kept similar (480 × 854 pixels resolution), thus the display gets an even lower pixel density.

It is also AMOLED technology and it too has a Quad HD resolution for a slightly lower pixel density of 518ppi.

Although that's a lower pixel density than the iPhone's Retina display, you tend to hold an iPad further away from your eyes than an iPhone, so the Retina definition still works out.

Samsung Galaxy J7 has also been equipped with this display, which makes for a good viewing experience despite the low pixel density.

That display technology is the same as you will find on the more expensive Kindle Voyage, but the Kindle Voyage has a lower pixel density (267ppi) since its display is 0.8 inch larger.

Against this Samsung brings the titular 10.1 - inch touchscreen, it's a PLS TFT capacitive at the same resolution as its competitor, resulting in a lower pixel density of 149ppi.

One of the ways it offsets the low pixel density is via the HDMI out which gives you 1080P video if you hook it up to a projector or your television.

And I noticed the dots that make up the letters — but I see that on the iPad, too, and the effect is worse there because of the iPad's lower pixel density.

While it sports only a dual - core processor, has a lower pixel density, and weighs twice as much as the 7 - inch Kindle Fire HDX, it may tempt those desiring the extra screen size for watching movies.

However, the iPad, by comparison has a large 9.7 - inch display, with a lower pixel density of 132, although the interface has been designed for it, so to a certain extent, the shoe fits better.

The low pixel density favors the functionality of Windows desktop mode, given that the window edges, as well as the control key which manages the windows, are not too tiny to be «aimed at» with the tip of the finger (which can sometimes be the case with tablets of the same diagonal, yet greater resolution).

It's bright and beautiful, though not quite as stunning as the Bold's since it has a lower pixel density.

What's odd is that using the lower pixel density shows you the Android 3.1 user interface on the Dell Streak 7, while a pixel density of 170ppi or higher shows you the Gingerbreaa UI.

The 10.6 - inch screen has a 16:9 aspect ratio and 140 pixels per inch, which TPCR found disappointing, noting the low pixel density is obvious especially when viewing slimmer fonts.

Only the budget Fire HD clocks in with a lower pixel density.

Most laptops in this price point feature a lower pixel density, while this laptop offers a full 1080p display.

Those competitors are dimmer and have a lower pixel density, so some compromise must be made.

Though Apple is content with having lower pixel density, it's hard to deny the advantage that Quad HD resolution gives the Galaxy S7 Super AMOLED display over the 1334 × 750 resolution of the iPhone's IPS panel.

The biggest thing I saw this low pixel density affecting was photo and video quality.

Due to its low pixel density though, you can easily spot jagged edges around icons.

That's an impressive length of time (anything over 8 hours is good) that's likely owed to the not - very - bright and small display, also its lower pixel density.

The Nexus 5X comes with a slightly larger 5.2 - inch IPS LCD screen, also with a 1080p resolution, resulting in a slightly lower pixel density of 424 ppi — a difference that you will be hard - pressed to notice.

With 294 pixels per inch, the relatively low pixel density is very noticeable when viewing basically any type of media, and we question whether Motorola would have been better served offering a Full HD panel (while keeping the price tag affordable).

There is a trade - off there — the larger display, with almost the same pixel count, means a slightly lower pixel density — but we don't think that it is a noticeable difference, and the slightly larger display size is preferable.

The combination of the huge screen size and the FHD resolution result in the lower pixel density that we are used to seeing in modern day smartphones.

Despite its low pixel density, though, this panel manages accurate color reproduction, respectable viewing angles, and reasonable brightness.

The low pixel density was noticeable in HD video and inaccurate gamma led to a washed - out look.

As for the cons, its display has a low pixel density, the camera, though 8MP, doesn't perform as such and the internal storage might be inadequate for media consumers.

While the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 comes with a 5.7 - inch Super AMOLED display with a Quad HD resolution, resulting in a pixel density of 518 ppi, the iPhone 6S Plus features a 5.5 - inch IPS LCD screen with a 1080p resolution, resulting in a lower pixel density of 401 ppi.

The 2014 Moto G sticks with the same 1280 x 720 pixel resolution as its predecessor and it also carries the «sharpest display in class» claim, but Motorola has increased the size to 5 - inches, meaning the new model has a slightly lower pixel density than the original at 293ppi.

On a screen that large, the low pixel density clearly shows and you'll not be very pleased with the display.

This results in a lower pixel density of 440ppi, but while Full HD isn't always great for VR, Google has claimed both the Pixels are built for Daydream.

This means that you get a lower pixel density of just 267ppi as opposed to the 401ppi you get with the ZenFone 3 and G4 Plus.

It's actually a better display than the SmartWatch 3 despite the lower pixel density — colors are more vibrant and, straight on at least, it offers a pleasant enough experience — but after using the Huawei Watch and Moto 360 (2015), this just doesn't cut it anymore.

This means it will feature a slightly lower pixel density of 386ppi.