Sentences with phrase «medium effect size»

This reduction was significant with an approaching medium effect size at 2 - month follow - up, and with a small effect at 1 - year follow - up.
Effect sizes were small, with one medium effect size on spouses» report of conflicts.
Individuals with psychotic disorders might choose to forgo antipsychotic medication because of side effects.1 Over 40 randomised controlled trials (RCT) have demonstrated that cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is generally efficacious in improving symptoms, with small to medium effect sizes in individuals with psychotic disorders.2 It was unknown, until now, if individuals with psychotic disorders who were antipsychotic - free could tolerate CBTp and benefit from it.
MacBeth et al 24 found medium effect sizes for child or parent outcomes in a review of the Mellow Parenting intervention for families with children aged 0 — 8 years.
Results for completers showed significantly better outcome for CGT with medium effect size differences on the ICG, Beck Depression Inventory, and Work and Social Adjustment Scale.
A paired - samples t - test demonstrated significant differences with small to medium effect sizes in the before and after scores for all three subscales.
Symptom reduction after schema group therapy for personality disorders alone and with comorbid depression were significant, with medium effect sizes (resp.ES = 0.48 and ES = 0.53).
The proximity preference for the DDS speaker in experiment 1 was associated with a medium effect size (η2 < 0.156), yet the same comparison in experiment 2 yielded a small effect size (η2 = 0.038).
IPT - A training was, however, associated with a large effect size (0.5) in relation to improvement on the HoNOSCA, and a medium effect size (0.3) for the CGAS scores.
This was judged by the evaluation to be a statistically significant, medium effect size.
Of the 249 children evaluated for conduct problems, 56 percent (140 children) improved after their parents participated in Group Triple P, representing a statistically significant, medium effect size.
Medium effect sizes were found for cons of smoking, perceived social norms, perceived behavior and self - efficacy.
At the end of the intervention (infant age = 24 month), attachment security scores derived from Waters» Attachment Q - Sort were in the predicted direction and showed a medium effect size, but did not reach criteria of statistical significance.
In a meta - analysis social support emerged as a significant predictor of loneliness with a medium effect size (Mahon et al., 2006).
Nevertheless, we found no substantial differences (i.e., with at least medium or close to medium effect sizes) on the SDQ between respondents with higher versus lower education.
Both treatments showed large effect sizes on the post-traumatic symptom outcomes, and a medium effect size on the behavior outcome, all statistically significant.
In a meta - analysis of psychotherapeutic treatment for youth depression, a mean small to medium effect size (ES) of.34 was demonstrated (Weisz et al. 2006).
Adolescents who reported exclusively romantic sexual relationships (n = 1,891) shared more emotional, but not social, activities with their partners than adolescents who were in non-romantic sexual relationships (n = 315; small effect size, r =.07 — .13), akin to adolescents who experienced both relationship types (n = 519; small - to - medium effect size, r =.18 — .38).
For the secondary outcomes, meta - analyses of generic mindfulness approaches suggest medium effect sizes in changes in depressive symptoms [19, 40] and our exploratory trial suggests medium effect sizes for the secondary outcomes of residual depressive symptoms, psychiatric co-morbidity and quality of life [25].
In addition, the power to detect significant differences for small to medium effect sizes was limited because of the relatively small cell sizes, particularly for satisfied couples with a depressed husband.
As hypothesised, self - compassion was negatively correlated with attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety, both with small to medium effect sizes.
Interpersonal problems had a significant positive correlation with overall emotional distress, anxiety symptoms and depressive symptoms, all of medium effect size.
A medium effect size was expected [6, 7, 8].
Given the variability of effect sizes between attachment and self - compassion (Raque - Bogdan et al. 2011; Wei et al. 2011), the current study assumed a medium effect size.
Attachment - related avoidance had a significant positive correlation with overall emotional distress and anxiety symptoms, both of medium effect size.
Medium effect sizes were found on conflict, social orientation and the FRI; small effect sizes were found on cohesion, expressiveness, organization and the FSI.
Self - compassion had a significant negative correlation with overall emotional distress and anxiety, with small to medium and medium effect sizes, respectively.
For mediation analysis using a bootstrapping approach, Fritz and Mackinnon (2007) recommended that in order to achieve a power of 0.8 to detect a medium effect size of the indirect effect, a sample size of 71 would be required.
Medium effect sizes were found for control, social orientation and the FSI and small effect sizes were found for cohesion, expressiveness, conflict, organization and the FRI..
Again, all of these group differences had medium effect sizes.
In order to have 0.8 power to detect a medium effect size when carrying out correlation / multiple regression analysis with three independent variables, a sample size of 76 would be required.
Post-hoc analysis indicated that only the HAPA - enhanced group exhibited a significant main effect of time, with a medium effect size of significant increase in life satisfaction over time, F1.45, 150.79 = 9.97, partial eta square = 0.09, P <.001.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z