On most climate change sites I go on there are articles on gas and electric heating but little on the effects of heating oil.
In May Nature World News reported on John Oliver's, host of HBO's Last Week Tonight, more comedic way of addressing the disparity that occurs
in most climate change debates.
Under
most climate change scenarios, dry places are going to get drier, wet places are going to get wetter, and times of drought and plenty will be increasingly unpredictable.
It's looking more and more
like most climate change can be pegged to changes in solar output, either directly through additional warming or indirectly as decreases in solar output allow more cosmic rays to reach the atmosphere, causing increased cloud nucleation and therefore increasing the earth's albedo and reflecting more solar radiation.
This methane has climate change impacts that, on a pound - for - pound basis, will be far more powerful over the next two decades than the carbon dioxide emissions that have been the focus
of most climate change discussions.
The findings, published in the journal Environmental Research Letters, reconfirm the basic science that increasing carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are
causing most climate change.
While most climate change studies have focused on sea level rise and water resources, the authors say research has ignored the aggravated impact such changes will have on large cities.
Denise Mauzerall, associate professor of environmental engineering and international affairs notes, «Unfortunately,
most climate change mitigation scenarios used in policy contexts have focused exclusively on heat - trapping gases.
Radiative flux is the proper term, but since «forcing» is what is used
by most climate change people, that is what I must use.
Most climate change predictions, when they incorporate population growth at all, have been based on the long - standing assumption that the planet's burden of humans will peak around 2050, and then begin a slow decline.
Insights from New Book on Sociology and Climate Change: Why Has an Understanding of the Sociological Causes of the Failure of Government to Respond to Climate Change and the Deep Ethical Problems with Most Arguments Against Climate Policies Been Missing
from Most Climate Change Literature?
Here's a list of cause and effect relationships, showing that
most climate change impacts will confer few or no benefits, but may do great harm at considerable cost.
2 simple questions that
even most climate change sceptics agreed with, turned into a soundbite waved around by politicians.
In a new piece for Yale Environment 360, Bruce Stutz discusses this trend and what different adaptation strategies might look like: Overshoot of Carbon Reduction Targets Very Likely The background:
Publicly most climate change scientists and policy - makers put on a happy can - do type of countenance, but when you attend conferences where things are a bit more sober and earnest, there's often much less optimism present about actually being able to prevent the worst of climate change.
It will take a more holistic approach than
most climate change research to date, examining the impacts on health, the environment, infrastructure, education, employment and opportunities that may arise from climate change.
The overarching justification for
most climate change policies today derives from a political interpretation of Principle 15 (now called the Precautionary Principle) of the United Nations Rio Declaration of 1992, which states: «Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost - effective measures to prevent environmental degradation.»
Angus S - F: «It's looking more and more
like most climate change can be pegged to changes in solar output» Doesn't it bother you that there's not really any actual evidence to show that cosmic rays affect climate?
These high rates of potential local and global extinction have stimulated urgent calls for proactive conservation planning [8] and there is a pressing need to identify
the most climate change vulnerable species, habitats and regions.
The president says he also came to Alaska because the Arctic is the world's
most climate change - impacted region.
Positively, the study will take a more holistic approach than
most climate change policy to date, and will examine the impacts on health, the environment, infrastructure, education, employment and opportunities that may arise from climate change.