Sentences with phrase «of global warming science»

New history of global warming science reveals that discovery of man - made influence was a political demand.

The piece is mainly advice for investors on how to integrate knowledge of global warming science and policy trends into investment choices.

Long story short, I don't examine the opposing sides of global warming science, I leave that to the scientists to sort out.

A review of the present status of the global warming science is presented in this paper.

Not surprisingly because it attacks the very basis of global warming science.

[8] His speech, titled «An Overview of Global Warming Science» can be viewed below.

The basics of global warming science remain robust — more greenhouse gases will continue to heat the planet, erode ice, raise seas and present challenges to many human and ecological communities.

Any case for action that downplays the durable and (unmanufactured) uncertainty surrounding vital aspects of global warming science is bound to fail in the end.

The United Nations» Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is meeting in Stockholm, Sweden, this week to iron out the final details of a widely anticipated report on the current state of global warming science.

Could it have something to do with the soundness of the IPCC / Al Gore version of global warming science which Oreskes is now tasked with defending?

Several recent studies have questioned many of the projections of climate change made by the IPCC reports and at present there is an emerging dissenting view of the global warming science which is at odds with the IPCC view of the cause and consequence of global warming.

I'm heading to a major local university here on the West Coast to better understand some dynamics of global warming science in more detail.

In 1998, Michaels blasted NASA scientist James Hansen, accusing the godfather of global warming science of being way off on his key 1988 prediction of warming over the next 10 years.

The Keeling Curve, a famous graph named after scientist Charles David Keeling, measures the increase in carbon dioxide concentration in the air since 1958; it is considered the bedrock of global warming science because it is generally believed that there is a direct correlation between increasing levels of carbon dioxide and global warming.

Even those dismissive of global warming science are close to neutral on sharply raising vehicle performance.

I think the main reason it is often difficult to convince a lot of people of global warming science is because it is simply harder to present a tangible and irrefutable example of the science at work.

Now the foes of limits on greenhouse gases have the ball, proclaiming the death of global warming science on the basis of flaws in the climate panel's report, recent fluctuations in temperature and the issues raised by the exposed e-mail messages and files of some climate scientists.

It's ironic because Nature, the «International weekly journal of science», has a troubling involvement in the false narrative and controlled message of global warming science.

Humans are the Primary Cause of Global Warming The science indicates humans are the primary cause of global warming at the > 95 % probability (In science.

The staggered release of the reports means they are often considered independently, making it harder to understand the policy implications of global warming science.

Spencer:»... for some reason it stopped warming in the last 10 years, which is one of those dirty little secrets of global warming science»

Many more flawed or misleading presentations of Global Warming science exist in the book, including those on Arctic sea ice thinning, correction of land - based temperature measurements for the urban heat island effect, satellite vs. ground - based measurements of Earth's warming, and controversies over sea level rise estimates.

A 2007 report by the U.N. Climate Panel, which is a snapshot of global warming science by the world's leading experts, said: «By mid-century, increases in temperature and associated decreases in soil water are projected to lead to gradual replacement of tropical forest by savannah in eastern Amazonia.»

Duffy suggested that the Goddard Institute deliberately tried to keep the change quiet because it undermined the case of what he calls «climate change orthodoxy», and claimed that «the discovery that it got one of the central data sets of global warming science and debate wrong is embarrassing and disturbing».

Antarctica's record level sea ice is troubling those who were earlier convinced of the global warming science.

Because of the complexity of global warming science as well as the challenge of securing accurate estimations of emissions from these various sectors, this estimation is the best we can hope for.

Speaking at the World Future Energy Summit in Abu Dhabi Wednesday, the IPCC chairman, Rajendra Pachauri admitted errors had been made but said it was not an excuse to question the legitimacy of all global warming science.

explain how much of the global warming science was funded by the U.S. military for purposes of national security --(AGW really wasn't hatched by a cabal of global communists) and it is time to use the information our military has paid for.

While the basics of global warming science are now firmly established, climatologists immersed in «attribution» research, investigating the mix of factors shaping a particular heat wave, deluge or drought, are still arguing long and hard about whether there is a discernible contribution from human - driven warming.

How a tiny blog and a collective of climate enthusiasts broke the biggest story in the history of global warming science — but not without a gatekeeper of the climate establishment trying to halt its proliferation.

Or is Paul defending against the charge by making a numbers argument — the scientists in question are on the same side as the consensus, so to challenge any aspect of global warming science or politics is to make a statement about «the majority of scientists» (many of whom are in fact social scientists)?

The IPCC has met to produce a sweeping report on the state of global warming science every five or six years since the group was founded in 1988.

Unfortunately, Crichton presents a error - filled and distorted version of the Global Warming science, favoring views of the handful of contrarians that attack the consensus science of the IPCC.

I honestly think that I've got some of the most engaging treatments of the history of global warming science to be found on the Web so far; I've structured them after some of the pivotal scientific papers published over the years.