New study finds striking level of agreement among climate experts on anthropogenic climate change
It divides publishing climate scientists into those that are convinced or unconvinced by scientific
evidence on anthropogenic climate change (and assesses the apparent relative scientific expertise of these according to their publishing history).
One of the most glaring differences between legitimate science - based blogs and those that deny the
science on anthropogenic climate change is how they write about polar bears and Arctic sea ice.
«For the many scientists who consider themselves both political conservatives and supporters of the consensus
position on anthropogenic climate change, ideology and party affiliation provide little shelter from attacks and harassment.
So back in 2006, the trail seemed to be
closing on anthropogenic climate change in the Antarctic and associated changes in southern hemisphere circulation (SAM) as being responsible for the decline in SW WA winter rainfall.
His responses to questions always pulled back from a straightforward use of IPCC
language on anthropogenic climate change, to keep his formulations closer to the manufactured sense of scientific uncertainty that characterized Bush administration officials and aligned them with the slant of the global warming disinformation campaign.
(June 21) New study finds striking level of agreement among climate experts on anthropogenic climate change
Two independent investigations rejected the charge that the content of the e-mails revealed a false
consensus on anthropogenic climate change, and cleared the scientists involved of any lack of integrity in the handling of data.
Betts says:» the authors seem to assume that climate science is entirely
focussed on anthropogenic climate change, and that natural variability is only researched as a supplementary issue in order to support the conclusions regarding anthropogenic influence.»
John Ioannidis, a man who notes that the evidence (and level of certainty)
on anthropogenic climate change is on par with the evidence (and level of certainty) that smoking kills people.
After all, the Atlantic piece relies on the work of John Ioannidis, a man who notes that the evidence (and level of certainty)
on anthropogenic climate change is on par with the evidence (and level of certainty) that smoking kills people:
Climate science expert credibility: New study finds striking level of agreement among climate experts on anthropogenic climate change
The climate - change conspiracy narrative requires some clarification too; those sceptical of the scientific consensus
on anthropogenic climate change may take either a «hard» position that climate - change is not occurring or a «soft» position that it may be occurring but isn't anthropogenic.
Scientific consensus
on anthropogenic climate change.